From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:46:10 +0300 Message-ID: <2d052de5-c80c-3430-105e-d0193c7eae11@gutov.dev> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyz2ctp0.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1hqb18d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27611"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, yantar92@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 15:46:32 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4Tn-0006xY-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 15:46:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4Tb-0000Vv-8J; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4Ta-0000Sn-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4TX-0002ce-O8; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3877232007CF; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:46:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:46:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1693575972; x=1693662372; bh=Nm6GOccr7imF7G3YYBCcMppOpYVTwefA7N8 TsWx6EXc=; b=nF7fDdH/XmZdISok1hrGs4yGLP+/Sl2F6ea2LAtevT07hbXHI4S HXgf1xefiL59i/TOChLHprp60bzW1m9bfZUB1ZeELZEi5jkXRPlJOkMx0+D/TqT2 gwwQCvwdm7f5DGEtHccLFOgSXk8tY37Z2vmy8bweSKeOldcbitvgjLtdSC7rDXYf R7K/8RTV8TjDcSaoUwFmd346cVYB8Yn+bcu/gBmwPAnuZ8JaXG68WrjyAD3F6HWk CklyECdASTK+WoLlYaeGKvs0DJpb3p7WjdRDxplQWNLCGeFEZngCexBeVNK5u4TD xA/ig3Zn1n7WD3LuaXYAOSUSNUGfEk0EE/A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693575972; x=1693662372; bh=Nm6GOccr7imF7G3YYBCcMppOpYVTwefA7N8 TsWx6EXc=; b=M5kgii5i7bIP6PXaGLn/EzcpZ2JDfAwAzOTYiukHG9PN60OuGxC qffvTUIUcgkkn1fV6+DsMkaz2GhJhFMIWB3JEsdt0YfcpIyc5ef6pZvJK/HLk7dj kaA7Sjjzkb7i+PgwFX7q2UhjuD2OyFImVfBuLrzif3Qat9Amzz9p1Wg1f7kbKZMV RLMEXBA3WV735k0bZkW0uIv3pr4MXujrObJIi3IUcMMwttOm1j+kaJpDEbIyiOT2 OO94+UfcUorj3MoQGcz0RFuYrylHTE67lvfWAoeKTzHTfggtNdnqUqm2QoOtuMpn tQ0w1AH5P0OvwzUpZG/8oRvo+0ccKSh/tmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudegvddgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefgteevheevveffheeltdeukeeiieekueefgedugfefgefhudelgfefveel vdevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:46:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83y1hqb18d.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -62 X-Spam_score: -6.3 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.478, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309788 Archived-At: On 01/09/2023 14:07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In any case, this feature of GitHub is not relevant, because in this > sub-thread I was comparing the email-based workflow with the GitHub > one. That GitHub has a feature to deliver email is not relevant since > the message to which I responded in effect said "I don't want to use > email". > >> Email is still very much a part of most people's work day. > Not according to the OP, no. I'm pretty sure OP's message was just missing those extra details. But they are welcome to clarify.