From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ken Manheimer" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: need option so line-move-to-column ignores fields, plus patch Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:19:01 -0400 Message-ID: <2cd46e7f0610111219k605b99e3w5c02d891304a85cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd46e7f0608310848l743430e9ia7a1d45e22428083@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609070747o5028d2bewd5a9e79a5afd4a46@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609231629hf2187cbl7e46507ee6070422@mail.gmail.com> <87zmcokjjs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87sligkja9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <2cd46e7f0609241853p6d9e9046p37b89b039d68ee92@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0610102113k3cd33334g135e6016d3146414@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160594397 15761 80.91.229.2 (11 Oct 2006 19:19:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 11 21:19:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXjbq-00018x-QV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:19:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXjbq-0003tU-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GXjbc-0003sG-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GXjbb-0003r7-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXjba-0003qy-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.249.82.232] (helo=wx-out-0506.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GXjje-0001JK-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so342494wxd for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:19:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tHRnktn6PtmpdLREkuNMFla16GmhBA90DaQtavmjbSKKjmubRqhKjnwiQGYeqEknyu9uuAu4/wRXxdXLPkSuE5VKoVbFGalTr0lP4FKcPInxOx/1USbSwBLqBm9LaG977FtbvDi2Bh+f9IbFA6IGP6eekUq7NusaJI6nYcseG0Y= Original-Received: by 10.90.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr771297agc; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.67.9 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60617 Archived-At: On 10/11/06, Richard Stallman wrote: > i'm still having some problems with the behavior. when moving > downwards, the cursor jumps to column 1 for one line when it would > wind up shifting to a new field. it then resumes column-sticky > behavior from the column on which it started, until the next field > change. > > That sounds like exactly what it is supposed to do. > Could you explain what you see as a problem? darting over to column 1 or the end of line when the line move brings it into a different field is entirely spurious for my purposes. just sticky column, regardless of fields, is much preferable. it would also be fine to have the cursor stick to the boundary, on the side of the field that the same as the field it came from, which is what i thought you were suggesting. i'm ok with just sticky column behavior, which is what my original patch did, and having the cursor dart to beginning or end of line and then recover the sticky column is better than the original behavior (where it would get stuck to beginning or end of line), so i can live with it, but it doesn't make sense in this context (ie, line motion between outline headlines). -- ken ken.manheimer@gmail.com http://myriadicity.net