as things approach release-readyness, i'm hoping that there's room to include this additional pgg patch i submitted. it brings the pgg-pgp and pgg-pgp5 support into line with the pgg scheme changes, and revises the pgg manual to track those changes as well. ken ken.manheimer@gmail.com On 10/29/05, Ken Manheimer wrote: > thanks for applying the patches. it looks all in place. i have a > supplemental patch which reenables pgp and pgp5 operation, as well as > rectifying the pgg.texi documentation with the changes (plus suitable > entries for lisp/ChangeLog and man/ChangeLog). > > this patch is somewhat speculative because i am unable to test it, not > having pgp or pgp5. most of the additional functionality is not > specific to the encryption software implementation, and where it is > (providing the right arguments for signing) i used a man page found on > the web to try to do the right thing. one thing i know is that > pgg-pgp5 and pgg-pgp would *not* work without this patch, because > there would be calling mismatches from the pgg generic functions. i > am fairly confident that the patched code will work well. > > ken > ken.manheimer@gmail.com > > > On 10/29/05, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Sascha Wilde > > > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:37:58 +0200 > > > Cc: Simon Josefsson , sascha schwab , > > > "Daiki Ueno \(pgg author\)" , > > > "Richard M. Stallman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > > > Ken Manheimer wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/26/05, Sascha Wilde wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the patch, but I'm missing the additions to the pgg > > > >> documentation I made. > > > > > > > > here is the texi part of your patch, exactly as it was in > > > > emacs-pgg-symmetric.patch-5 as you sent it. (i included your > > > > ChangeLog entry in the part of my patch for the ChangeLog, and > > > > similarly for the pgg.el and pgg-gpg.el source files, so i think it's > > > > now complete.) > > > > > > Yes, thank you! > > > > > > Could someone with write access please commit these two patches? > > > > Done, thanks. > > > > >