thanks for applying the patches.  it looks all in place.  i have a
supplemental patch which reenables pgp and pgp5 operation, as well as
rectifying the pgg.texi documentation with the changes (plus suitable
entries for lisp/ChangeLog and man/ChangeLog).

this patch is somewhat speculative because i am unable to test it, not
having pgp or pgp5.  most of the additional functionality is not
specific to the encryption software implementation, and where it is
(providing the right arguments for signing) i used a man page found on
the web to try to do the right thing.  one thing i know is that
pgg-pgp5 and pgg-pgp would *not* work without this patch, because
there would be calling mismatches from the pgg generic functions.  i
am fairly confident that the patched code will work well.

ken
ken.manheimer@gmail.com


On 10/29/05, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Sascha Wilde <wilde@sha-bang.de>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:37:58 +0200
> > Cc: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>, sascha schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
> >       "Daiki Ueno \(pgg author\)" <ueno@unixuser.org>,
> >       "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > Ken Manheimer <ken.manheimer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/26/05, Sascha Wilde <wilde@sha-bang.de> wrote:
> > >> Thanks for the patch, but I'm missing the additions to the pgg
> > >> documentation I made.
> > >
> > > here is the texi part of your patch, exactly as it was in
> > > emacs-pgg-symmetric.patch-5 as you sent it.  (i included your
> > > ChangeLog entry in the part of my patch for the ChangeLog, and
> > > similarly for the pgg.el and pgg-gpg.el source files, so i think it's
> > > now complete.)
> >
> > Yes, thank you!
> >
> > Could someone with write access please commit these two patches?
>
> Done, thanks.
>