From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making better use of the "release blocking list" [was: bug#23288: 25.0.92; Clicking on links inserts primary X selection] Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:30 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <2c190d85-70f2-474b-59b4-04248dbaeb51@cs.ucla.edu> References: <83mvnxau5t.fsf@gnu.org> <83futobsw1.fsf@gnu.org> <837ff0b931.fsf@gnu.org> <33d66ff1-7bf2-2ba5-29d9-b510bf1e344e@cs.ucla.edu> <1v60ud253m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83eg8v6xju.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3ct5wt7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464020190 15846 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2016 16:16:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 18:16:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b4sWe-0003bf-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 18:16:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4sWe-0008BG-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4sW6-0008B7-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4sW4-0005Lf-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:54009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4sVx-0005Ib-2O; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5F9161218; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id nAwmm24Hc81e; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C97161271; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id w131kxoEQhoq; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCF90161218; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:15:30 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203959 Archived-At: On 05/23/2016 06:18 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Could you look at bug#23595, then? It shows a behavior that became > worse in 25.1 since 24.5 (even though it's not so great in 24.5 either). I get the same awful behavior with both 24.5 and 25, at least when registering the file under RCS using Fedora 23. In both cases, Emacs displays mojibake because rcsdiff outputs a "Binary files ... differ" message in ASCII and Emacs I guess assumes that the message is in UTF-16. It's obviously a bug but I don't see a regression.