From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Extend gdb to filter registers Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:41:49 +0100 Message-ID: <2b3a16d7-4eb8-1b78-686a-8535ea5a42ef@gmx.at> References: <83iml8zkbm.fsf@gnu.org> <6ad85759-7408-f177-38f6-45a72c2f5a9e@gmx.at> <83eevwzi79.fsf@gnu.org> <68ef651e-9319-b392-af1c-4564d5db9112@gmx.at> <831rrvzc81.fsf@gnu.org> <997C9AD2-D8DD-45DC-9195-28FEC907B2C4@gmail.com> <83muajxs04.fsf@gnu.org> <416593FF-C4BE-478F-B5AC-3379235146ED@gmail.com> <83lfq3xp66.fsf@gnu.org> <679953AF-F50A-4ABE-B836-150BA0F95DAE@gmail.com> <83h80rxlae.fsf@gnu.org> <8A5A507A-6036-4894-A8B1-749109EBE605@gmail.com> <83wo9mvwco.fsf@gnu.org> <2BEA3843-859E-481B-8561-35384438EF7F@gmail.com> <83lfpxs4sl.fsf@gnu.org> <162a03e4-2429-b7b7-0e9e-df0b433b8aea@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="46461"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Yuan Fu , Juri Linkov , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 26 09:44:48 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ivdXE-000C3U-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60458 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivdXD-0007jZ-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 03:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivdUc-0006A6-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 03:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivdUb-0002gI-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 03:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:44739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivdUZ-0002aH-H2; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 03:42:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1580028112; bh=4sfOXL3uFxkP9Zr7LKdGlOhpfFq6HcXVfKUDDtuzwi4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TUmSesBUKtubkIwZaf4p/k/LSL5LrNghMukJzgYhRVBKGRW3sShtZ/sljJaPPeMU4 oV7aNh0fyrthhR+oD1Jwb398r25004pepBcCOswafLA026iwVesoYjykIv8mQKyd8W ArS93Hf0hvMyJm2iwO+zwOLIWyKZdO00tWYbLxUA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.152]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N6sit-1jf6qN0ZpP-018I2h; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:41:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:OU/NrYiNhlGR4WuvnLbffRvWsVLtcWmElSLV9fw7nQjxZ/G18jH EYgIetDaca4cChTBReTgRniEgUmj3Y/KWLd0BNlaUPgtYxF+Dd8IRll03uwbmzhofk9v1jK aC4eWYbLyejtiGyqcC5Ka5qqHeGhCUlKlI9m+54rXkszUDSyJqXVJHUG4A+0uy32lGu7ulA KDYUbW03YvF4D3V+Dp0YA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:u+epCr/xPoQ=:tIbMojNA9X9tWzurFe7r6F gZSVVj2VEPWwM/sl45kn0cbU3ltBOTKU7iHDoUMkaaVWjq5xXDpQgdQjO/tl++sPU25pkvZqY Kr/fqAOP/Mvrobyp6jb+OxsOI41zbZwlGlFiQblJNeDCEViLSORs7UngadWbBT0rt+MwLOP7J Ys2WtoEo/DaIdiQa94RvzS5oMkJOmpNSSOasZ73VQjlCnlkm9tAbn9wiuDYxnNPFjcLNDCrCY l9MeWyjfIrwXc99iPt2myiBtt0niT+FSFNZQFOB7XGPOqO/eCg4KHFMgyvD789h+tDJWFwFx/ Jamb/QSsy9Lhe/lbWP4p1Toi0115mMxpjldlgRnZ/RVRnnPT0qr12SUl3KZ6V5OiejZl3+pMm 3GNzoIwuh0wqZfEBXLi1kc0PV2tdK03pZcNfR+NqJPYVy4k+VZvfZzHDJ7Tb7fLj+vbtiqCE2 0Y55LXTyD7T4e+7wbhZ3HlkT9rfnG6jr++XZJcOHBvVXpDwTxAoAvGRx4LW8CeN1hzVlW/hoW l2GfPRqYlKx6aQ6UIx5Dt/NvGi88WiTkvkWlJGLKX8KYB7jixX/vpdrg/BjCizm9saq0gNNaU Zn42+/cxTz8TJqo9Cp04M6hl+t7xq6ACI5X7q4dNGbrBswj3RyavjVvSoUzhkqXNCVd2fMJck RkeebBJZvYqD1JFLcsSwuBA2/fCyrKif9iFi/1fkdCMolCGtaGAqq0rq3GtuhK+LIUtiLj8KO izG9B9yqz+0jU5IWOcpJqrG5IAMLlFkGNhMC3Zb+36hLiYHhg31zkrbHjxvpsykILJwin3Ba X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244649 Archived-At: > I do not want to disable splitting altogether, only of certain > windows. You always can do that by setting the 'split-window' parameter of those windows to 'ignore'. > Thus an unsplittable frame solution is not practical Maybe you should put those windows in an atomic window then. >> (2) making windows fixed-size > > Making a windows fixed-size seems - at best - a kludge. > It provides no way to state my intent. Instead I achieve > that intent - namely preventing certain windows from > getting split - indirectly by specifying an unrelated property. > The dissonance here is that I actually do _not_ want my > windows (in this case gdb-mi's dedicated windows) to > be fixed-size. I regularly resize those windows by dragging > their borders. Would that continue to be possible once I > make the windows fixed size? No. >> (1) setting 'split-height-threshold' and 'split-width-threshold' >> accordingly > > Using ridiculously large splitting thresholds does allow > me to have stable windows that never get split while > continuing to be resizeable via dragging. The unfortunate > side-effect is that it prevents display-buffer from managing > the large amount of screen space I have provided for > displaying source buffers. Right. > An unsplittable window property sure seems appealing :-) > > The semantics are straight forward. And I find it hard to > imagine that the implementation would be very difficult. > I expect that the biggest efforts would be documentation, > NEWS, etc. If all you want is to make a window really "unsplittable", the 'split-window' parameter mentioned above should accomplish that. I suppose though, that you want to make such windows unsplittable for 'display-buffer' only. And this will cause real problems because how should 'display-buffer-below-selected' or 'display-buffer-at-bottom' handle such a case? martin