From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5b3c4004a9 2/2: Remove calls to intern with a static string from code that runs on X Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:18:03 +0000 Message-ID: <2b1180d2e53a4f676524@heytings.org> References: <166355307855.3830.3892166668612546304@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220919020439.67823C00874@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <874jx328ye.fsf@gnus.org> <877d1zsufw.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkrbredr.fsf@yahoo.com> <878rmfpy2g.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsgmn8cy.fsf@yahoo.com> <2b1180d2e5035730c58d@heytings.org> <87tu52lart.fsf@yahoo.com> <2b1180d2e5a07d0773c9@heytings.org> <87a66ul30g.fsf@yahoo.com> <2b1180d2e5ee5ff71aa1@heytings.org> <871qs6l0u6.fsf@yahoo.com> <2b1180d2e5ec9c1f8a54@heytings.org> <87sfkmjjr5.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 19:45:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oahIy-0000Gl-5k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oahIw-0002V2-Cj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oae4f-0007Nr-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:49146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oae4c-0004OY-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:18:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663683483; bh=nRAx35I9ruqe55JV72izi6RdRgs7FG9k9NJU89Q3reM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=qEdeF9EKddJM/QmrGfDodHzmJx3DgrL5YwjQU7pxyWCN9FdlRpmW1+C8PXs/xMJic vPM5cZDYQ24EOZ/y7O4nVvF1awdCO/rHVouf0wVZsRKG5AKLGC67DvDC8Oa6CDOBQ7 MRD+B+cBSq+n5uHs2oNUbklELFW2gC9tp0KlTMQmWSyTU25g0PxJ3cOqu8btQcWv7S 44VCEV8BSbdRMAuPpftdq/PgWUT11kSd8U/MAK0KAmuhC7JZxE8t2Kh6yVyUDK1DgZ wjXd9ilK9gsL8zIneXHAXxplo3im4Kzj8yL8ivrG/B0ArJT2lmykOjycd8RQ3XHxyS divoxiatetjOQ== In-Reply-To: <87sfkmjjr5.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295822 Archived-At: > > What "emacs -Q" does is not the only correct behavior out there, is it? > It isn't, but what we ask to anyone who reports a bug is to provide a minimal recipe starting with emacs -Q. I don't see why the problem you see would be different. Anyway, I've now changed the way the message is displayed, it now uses three leading stars and is redirected to stderr, which is e.g. what the Linux kernel uses. Does that fix your problem? > > Once again, you (being a native English speaker) may not find it > difficult to understand, but I do, and probably many other people who > grew up where I did. > I guess it's a matter of taste. To me this (which is the only message that most people will ever see): "make all" failed with exit status 2. You might try to: - run "make bootstrap", which might fix the problem - run "make V=1", which displays the full commands invoked by make, to further investigate the problem immediately tells me that there is a build failure, and that I have two options: "make bootstrap" to try to fix the problem, and "make V=1" to investigate the problem. What is unclear to you in that message?