From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Drop OS X 10.4 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:11:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2A2D6A35-0804-412D-BEA4-A23592FFC244@swipnet.se> References: <543806BC.9050300@cs.ucla.edu> <43EC184F-DCCC-4A62-986E-00EF144981B4@swipnet.se> <8BBA848D-F715-4284-AC3B-DFC96B103D57@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413306713 19332 80.91.229.3 (14 Oct 2014 17:11:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 14 19:11:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe5dQ-0004Oo-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:11:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe5dP-0005bi-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:11:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe5dJ-0005bb-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe5dC-0000Vw-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe02.swip.net ([212.247.154.33]:44140 helo=swip.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe5dB-0000Va-T8; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:11:30 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 540765064; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from [10.50.10.10] (unknown [188.126.74.12]) (Authenticated sender: jhd) by hosdjarv.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D4E91A0263; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:11:23 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <8BBA848D-F715-4284-AC3B-DFC96B103D57@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.247.154.33 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175355 Archived-At: Hello. I have added a test to configure. But I was wondering about = crosscompiling. We really do not support that, do we? Jan D. 14 okt 2014 kl. 07:08 skrev Jan Dj=E4rv : > Hello. >=20 > 13 okt 2014 kl. 18:48 skrev Glenn Morris : >=20 >> Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: >>=20 >>> I don't think so. After all, if you are building for X or no = toolkit, >>> it is basically just UNIX with an unexec that works on Intel. I = don't >>> think that we should prevent configurations that we in principle >>> support (X, no-X, unexmacosx.c). A check for PowerPC might be in = order >>> though as we don't support that. >>>=20 >>> I could add that, but I don't have any PowerPC to test it on. >>=20 >> Oh, but all the other points still apply: >>=20 >> OS X 10.4 itself is unsupported for 5+ years. >> No Emacs developer has it to test on. >> All the bug reports about it come from one person (who seems to be = doing >> an "explore the compilation parameter space" thing rather than = actually >> wanting to use it). >> All the bug reports are about PPC; >> = http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?include=3Dsubject%3A10.4;package=3D= emacs >> (whether this means it is working fine on non-ppc, I have no data = for! :) ) >>=20 >> So personally I see no value to pretending it is still supported, and >> think it might as well be explicitly dropped. >>=20 >=20 > I have to do some other test, because the test relies on Cocoa dev = environment being present. > Stand by. >=20 >>> A check for PowerPC might be in order though as we don't support = that. >>=20 >> Should be easy? >>=20 >> *** configure.ac 2014-10-12 22:56:45 +0000 >> --- configure.ac 2014-10-13 16:47:29 +0000 >> *************** >> *** 557,563 **** >> *-apple-darwin* ) >> case "${canonical}" in >> i[3456]86-* ) ;; >> ! powerpc-* ) ;; >> x86_64-* ) ;; >> * ) unported=3Dyes ;; >> esac >> --- 557,563 ---- >> *-apple-darwin* ) >> case "${canonical}" in >> i[3456]86-* ) ;; >> ! powerpc-* ) unported=3Dyes ;; >> x86_64-* ) ;; >> * ) unported=3Dyes ;; >> esac >=20 > Thanks, I checked that in. >=20 > Jan D. >=20