From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Estival Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: packages submissions : ob-sql-session and org-blog Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:02:49 +0200 Message-ID: <28da95b9-131a-4fbf-bedc-56219082233d@7d.nz> References: <87zfoe64bl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5845"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 12:03:57 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sqV3s-0001H7-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:03:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sqV3T-0008V3-C0; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 06:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sqV3R-0008TW-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 06:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-42a9.mail.infomaniak.ch ([2001:1600:7:10::42a9]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sqV3Q-00020k-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 06:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-4-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-4-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.7.10.108]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X7HRL0nQXzWwx; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:03:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=7d.nz; s=20240212; t=1726567406; bh=P4OZLXYY+Q0eDVDFM4EgmCBA7NP65WC+HYkoB2wB1z8=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M+rJbNd+vlbZcBFK4Ga8SDywh8uj1tI5SBabIWRdi0P9rBw1x13RLr0J7BC4aXmj6 SHtLKZ99xZWhTmCzjnKCxgFpS6Qxa6g5S4+KH5Cxf+QV6HJ0PiQMDYJKvHObOLjsnG xZhWmXdZ/k1vkcTBI3/nhFtAk9CF8tYL+pab63eOLxRGDmlKGgdCe9jfeQ1kWGsJSm guSoP3aMDYW4aTvd56v5MfgoeYh5ABb1f9wLOOa+vIoS/UhoFae0gI2zM9+UFOdHYC C6f16EWdkzqOMYkLti3S8OZINm211JGbkUl3MAiN0RBKLS340S6kcRDVZ8mstphGD0 Dq7p8HMDsqc0g== Original-Received: from unknown by smtp-4-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4X7HRK3NC7zqjv; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-ZA In-Reply-To: <87zfoe64bl.fsf@posteo.net> X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:1600:7:10::42a9; envelope-from=pe@7d.nz; helo=smtp-42a9.mail.infomaniak.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323683 Archived-At: * [2024-09-11 09:24] Philip Kaludercic: > Phil Estival writes: >> Hello on ob-sql-session >> that I'd like to submit to ELPA, with >> the advise and approval of emacs-devel. > Just to be sure, you mean GNU ELPA (not NonGNU ELPA), right? I think so. The ownership transferred to the FSF and a copyright assignment. One word about the license notice: I'm in agreement with Stephan's opinion: > historically we have accepted both "is part of GNU Emacs" and "is NOT > part of GNU Emacs". IMO the better choice is to say neither. on org-blog : > Hmm, I don't know if we have any literate programs on ELPA yet. If you > prefer that style of development, that is fair, but what I would suggest > would be to add a Makefile and extract the elisp at "compile-time", or > in the case of ELPA when the tarball is being built. > skimming through the .org file (which most certainly should /not/ be > the README btw) the code could also use some cleaning > up, at least if the intention is to publish it as a generic package. > The functions don't seem to adhere to a specific conventional namespace, > I have my doubts as to how much sense it would make to try and convert > this personal code into a proper package, instead of starting over again :/ Understood. I'll be back with something cleaner, reconsider where it can rely on the existing structures, and seek more advice on the Org mailing list. Thanks for everything. Phil