From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: B Smith-Mannschott Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switching to bzr: what Emacs developers should know? Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 20:51:31 +0200 Message-ID: <28c656e20908081151h55a4b566v4cfc7c49c5ca2a37@mail.gmail.com> References: <874osi6zpe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249757566 23701 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2009 18:52:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 20:52:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZr1y-0007oX-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:52:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57445 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr1x-0005JE-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:52:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr10-000511-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:51:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr0w-0004zK-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:51:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51093 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr0v-0004zE-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f205.google.com ([209.85.220.205]:45433) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZr0v-0004hd-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1649077fxm.31 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zhXCafGDukqj3N4kOb5lsgQryrP6H7/uLhG1tJLlN+c=; b=PPIiEjakMpqJxJ6UHRggCq3P2FWmYZEJQbuSz3nbq3crulepNRNkguzJDjwoVRsKGN uelqJPgSgMHW6xK6ni+J8/Jjtd7aSWUR0/WyYTV4N+E2JjheXaotiQmtIknfyJUJ5TD9 16b7bzmA45peYwgvYwOPE+k9e73G7ih98fDdY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DVjPIlfzqWTl+OYk9R62aNfYUXmgte7ifBjSM8ObfqfsEQ3HwbfUWa8kUs7CE4mIox Q+BQuz4eBl72PPi8TD38bJrVd2CU/ZGHcJn6+YnopVy/2pX8rgfCa59ZR1dncufPU1ja cFG2C+J4GTSN5ZQg23PzqK1cmWx2m6mhSlvUU= Original-Received: by 10.223.112.135 with SMTP id w7mr557892fap.39.1249757491838; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:51:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874osi6zpe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113807 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 18:24, Bastien wrote: > Can someone describe the bzr workflow for Emacs developers? Presumably, you've seen this, yes?: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BzrForEmacsDevs > Will the switch to bzr affect the way upstream packages like Gnus > or Org are integrated in Emacs development? > > Would there be any advantage of switching to bzr for these packages? Well, the wiki page currently only says: [quote] Merging Upstream Packages (e.g., Gnus) Into Emacs With Bazaar TODO: TBD (but frankly, this should be easy, as it fits perfectly with the DVCS/Bazaar model anyway) [/quote] // ben