From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: what make-dist should include [was Re: Emacs pretest 26.1.91 is out] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:42:28 -0800 Message-ID: <28595.1547703748@alto> References: <7zfttsgahx.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547703645 28524 195.159.176.226 (17 Jan 2019 05:40:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs Devel To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 17 06:40:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gk0Pw-0007Jq-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:40:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gk0S3-0001EB-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gk0Rx-0001E4-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gk0Rw-0004br-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:63721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gk0Rw-0004b6-GH; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:42:44 -0500 Original-Received: from alto (96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id x0H5gT6R072418 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:42:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host 96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133] claimed to be alto In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2019 05:30:50 -0500." <7zfttsgahx.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 26.1.90 Content-ID: <28594.1547703748.1@alto> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x X-Received-From: 198.144.192.42 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232417 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: > > > For example, .gitignore is relevant to anybody who > > checks a tarball's files into a fresh Git repository, > > (and then builds in place) [...] > I doubt such people exist, for either example. When I unpack an Emacs tarball, I usually check it into a fresh Mercurial repo before building. So I wouldn't be surprised to see someone do that with Git. (Or am I misunderstanding the example?) mike