From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Watchpoints for emacs lisp. Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <28586371.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <28512483.post@talk.nabble.com> <28523705.post@talk.nabble.com> <28567671.post@talk.nabble.com> <28574547.post@talk.nabble.com> <7FA18246-9874-4EC2-AAEB-55B693541C20@mit.edu> <28577522.post@talk.nabble.com> <28585093.post@talk.nabble.com> <28585789.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274117373 20330 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2010 17:29:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:29:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 17 19:29:31 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE48A-0000Ng-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:29:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OE48A-0002i4-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40701 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OE483-0002gb-83 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE481-0006dB-Nq for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:50996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE481-0006cz-J7 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 13:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OE480-0004sr-QG for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 10:29:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124863 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > > > Bazaar uses a lot of memory when doing a checkout of Emacs. It seems > like it hit a GNU/Linux bug here. > I have only 500K of memo, and a processor Quad, with 4 modues. > >> I do not know who played with emacs' sources, but the old cvs worked >> excellent. With bzr I have been trying for 2 days to check out, and I >> still >> have no idea how it works. > > There are alternatives, but I have never used them. Please see: > > http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsFromGit > > Yes, I want some alternatie. I do not want bzr either. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Watchpoints-for-emacs-lisp.-tp28512483p28586371.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.