From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Potential bug in the logic of rmail-select-summary Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:04:33 +0100 Message-ID: <27bf2070-6c72-afb9-dbc8-c1855470123b@gmx.at> References: <8735ywyhli.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <83wnw87p5k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6296"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , =?UTF-8?Q?G=c3=b6ktu=c4=9f_Kayaalp?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 20:43:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1wuB-0001Xe-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:43:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1wuA-0001B7-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:43:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1wIz-0004zf-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:04:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:48039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1wIw-0005jC-By; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:04:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1611083074; bh=mKB3KLd3AkGOJHlXowr7fmoNeLDXgGLNEkn9p0pqD88=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=XGm4BBTxTQOWtlOQjLz4yQ6b2F/goQt8lKbv14pNUMRgfv3xq+H0tP7PNN+d5k44t rDhB2JLzqt1s0kSiVFdYfn0kB68pr3IXiTFQfTUWj8CsYLDiX+O6RcFHft2aWvr2k4 EBCQSJtLI7qRDr81Vp9qk9SN7XxlWMNyCz1VY3j4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mr9Fs-1lmnzQ1efm-00oJWC; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:04:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wnw87p5k.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1DsFB3gOg1ZNScegPAcbkMFn9yIJX7HutLA8aVrTApLfLU+aBrI yQIMfyWXFdoMOXEbWmgqUL4Mbo1qhnMUUX2aUf8jDypzggBk4Q8BDMFYqaOFOz3AS0bkirL ZhrXlP7ShM+XoRy1rCaYVhMPhsAP888lBxMWT0FMs9V339aSjH4srqFwlVLdbm3+97cC6yG Fenx387dVmIZTNJvH2AxA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:UGeS4XK1A48=:lhY0obT6ZM6fAgB7DcKxLN c/ugfOhbWtcFBm5zC6xiI4688hgU7G7aYSKtnfzN96C2dPTxmB7jD1dgQ4cx/ILPdQ+MKWn6W GedrymmOXWT1gV/V8pTaB26xp/z/Buth5Fy/YM1tQmpUyIC/IsK3XFRAbrjOZm02DLX5uqjNc Nn0dBp+XjOXc0cRVVVgdwpdhzMv0xpieJzOsZC6aYqvUbIeCa23CmNMRWtf8p7bJBIrZ15xnE PoKjEXfRTC0z4kw3R16Xnml2rq8xMjUBbdedp499gz0cqeFERG3RrJI2lTft5pGcVnXyVt4pB pnNUVAj9LIfgl+XH1XPAFyQfITmAkJTi83fgE4hYCLyPkXdGOw07XLq2bxdTX3eJdIG0eorLp +POCerymxkrvKKjW3NmvWf70XR67fmYzeHr261zF2WDa0gganas60Jftbqtqg/00UPVXABib7 P0Bs7GBeMcI1VzaoNW79khr6LAT/LnGHUK5h7Mj82gs+j627i7ZnQNyAVqoGn1Vu7UzZQywF0 2nugAjWJjZa+TwZpC1WoU0MAl7Zkn724TuKXiIHIfPryuFXvp++sWOrjkdu1O0QkDYWZ4ivL4 tZ/IX7drTn9r4x0LeLnB8Bh6g47bgU6oKPhN7SsS4q+OndFOCoM+sOu3MQf92bIQAd3MG63Fd 6NcrsFMz7JYSuc7dxxo2F4YIkjV8aWgXD1xorxYpjozssFFVp2JgBuCFlVZF2FAB97dsMeMN1 IL0/lJtff0gMsYBUPtQ63LS5Ui1iXIj78Qe/HMQTNwycSVlELEbMe/QUkjS+ltvln8E5x7Jf Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=rudalics@gmx.at; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263180 Archived-At: > Well, you in fact asked Emacs to use display-buffer-same-window for > displaying any buffer except the few you explicitly exempted, no? > Then I think it's what you asked for. Right. >> AFAIU rmail-pop-to-buffer could use some form of display-buffer-* to >> avoid going through display-buffer-alist. An overriding action? That's much too severe. > Yes, but I'm not sure we should prevent users from customizing the > way Rmail buffers are displayed. Rmail is free to do what it wants in this regard. But (".*" . (display-buffer-same-window)) is a much too strong customization IMO. It conflates 'pop-to-buffer' with its standard "pop to a window other than the selected one even if the buffer is already displayed in the selected window" behavior with 'switch-to-buffer'. Don't do that - it may miss too many cases. martin