From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 1e3b0f2: Improve doc strings of project.el Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:23:42 +0300 Message-ID: <27b37b2d-c509-b5fb-c633-fc9dd60dc184@yandex.ru> References: <87bllfqj82.fsf@warpmail.net> <83o8pfxhzq.fsf@gnu.org> <83imfnxgt3.fsf@gnu.org> <73f90d2e-b754-93e0-4caa-5f86601edd98@yandex.ru> <83ftarxf58.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="113189"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: philip@warpmail.net, theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 19 20:24:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmLga-000TLq-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 20:24:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmLgZ-0000yS-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmLg4-0000MB-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::535]:36624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmLg2-00007X-EJ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id y6so8348497edi.3; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dC8ErTfS3un648tC/0kNVhA/k3sd0yqmVgizU5PSR4s=; b=ob9wNIUZVqiZ2MGbsd/egwMXqexpIiEqMoAVtZ98Oys5UrL8gmrB+dNYJpt3laka0M 0U3PWhgibUFCoKH2Hbs+vJx51QD7qbuKb4elQPhaX+NeaRZr/QkK6syq+6Hw8z66bEcX jD/2iqQibTK1n1sxjGBOqou9OseMgfJWMMaqc2cboygezbXRF4yKsGNWO0ftYKa8VKQi QH1I/8VzSD655WfTY6EL35BUevQrrQAmTuvGzv3H3mfil/ncPuFjnF+cJcIj+5klFq6w vxYgCON9ZsUEZpv+ilHAxvpbamazn4rmIXoN7brT3HswJH6N3lJFgI8sBX7dVouEFSJi fpSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dC8ErTfS3un648tC/0kNVhA/k3sd0yqmVgizU5PSR4s=; b=MqdTemye8YioVErbKCQSkz7IxMZXnI/s6JsBMsTVKMfMw1LDGLOJlacTaQ6fOs4YaE ++eMX1dzgnyO3ZpZswMdhq1fTWKO9GBTbVaKLl/wGWEtWthBZEyMN1Ivt4ToDsZo80NX 7Q53XmDGAHkPMNaAELfTvXav4Gt6t+c+xgYd44MjBY66yowWyBt3Xj2KpmcEzbr9VdHZ /hrv+yF7+uuft/x75Kqs9/ynHtqTkl3qiVqjl6JX50LaKWLlr6O1BSh5mbWvXy4hSZpG xExuOeCk15siYZLUNUP6+ljNdDt6VUi7cMbflE3kzE04FwlcHLMTHQBJ9GEbzQz/Snuk ddqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53242uR12fXvf0h0uc3Adx8HOaKAGhHCyMLRE/tKvJm0Xu8k4Hy8 MOJw+WhLtUrqBoedJRpxkkwpghPE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzAlRX6J0P1xOGBBHNXqKSvzfz2TFMrHgLndGArHVpE+urQZmd+JU1s05Saea0PJukQEr9fA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df05:: with SMTP id c5mr4502185edy.48.1592591024422; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w21sm5212409ejc.11.2020.06.19.11.23.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:23:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ftarxf58.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::535; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x535.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252392 Archived-At: On 19.06.2020 18:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> It's not the worst idea, but the set of "buffers belonging to the >> current project" should probably be the same between >> project-switch-to-buffer and project-kill-buffers. > > No, not necessarily. The purpose of the commands is different, so > they could start with the same basic list, but apply different filters > to it. There can be subtle differences (e.g. ones stemming from project-kill-buffers-skip-conditions), but the general notion of what it mean to have a buffer belong to a project should be generally the same. >> And as Philip explained, it's useful for the latter to consider many >> different major modes. > > I'm talking about the former, not about the latter. And I am talking about both.