From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: History: Edwin and Emacs Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 05:15:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27755740.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267535750 31398 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 13:15:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:15:50 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 14:15:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmRwl-0004Nm-MQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:15:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60290 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmRwk-0000qH-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmRwf-0000qC-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:15:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59768 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmRwe-0000px-9t for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmRwd-0007j1-CU for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:50450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmRwd-0007is-7i for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NmRwb-0006bU-Ih for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:15:25 -0800 X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121535 Archived-At: I wish to ask you what is the history of Edwin. How was it derived from emacs? It is very strange, because it uses lexical scope, and in the same time it uses emacs code. But using lexical evaluator, it cannot run the .el files from emacs. Does somebody know what was the historical derivation of edwin from emacs? What modules from emacs were preserved in edwin, and how the interpreter was replaced, etc. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/History%3A-Edwin-and-Emacs-tp27755740p27755740.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.