From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27563728.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27349166.post@talk.nabble.com> <27560255.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265982127 27552 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2010 13:42:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:42:07 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 14:42:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfvmW-0008D5-Hn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:42:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfvmW-0001KW-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NfvmR-0001KB-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34375 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfvmQ-0001Jt-Nb for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfvmQ-0008Ht-3p for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:35730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfvmP-0008Hn-VA for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NfvmP-0004Gs-Fc for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:41:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121075 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > >> An improvement in redisplay for X can be done by defining in the edit >> area of >> every window a subwindow for every character. For a window of geometry >> 200x70 of characters, it would be 1400 windows registered in X-server. > > Wouldn't that be 14,000? > I do not pretend the solution to be realistic, I just asked if it is good or not. The only structure that would be allocated is a lot of little windows. Apart from this, the computations on the client side are simpler. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/redisplay-system-of-emacs-tp27349166p27563728.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.