From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sentinel interfering with compile's mode line update Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:49:01 -0800 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <27418.1133574541@olgas.newt.com> References: <20167.1133550632@olgas.newt.com> <4390DAA6.70108@yahoo.com> <24938.1133567818@olgas.newt.com> <87lkz3hszu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133574604 9087 80.91.229.2 (3 Dec 2005 01:50:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 02:49:59 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiMWe-000882-Bw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 02:49:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiMWe-0002cX-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:49:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EiMWW-0002cE-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EiMWU-0002c1-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:49:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiMWU-0002by-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [69.93.192.76] (helo=tassie.newt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EiMWY-0000Ye-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (m190e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.25]) by tassie.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4C12D4012; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:49:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by olgas.newt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D37DA16FD8; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:49:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgas.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE43B16FAD; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:49:01 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: Stefan Monnier's message of Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:31:18 EST. <87lkz3hszu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.85+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46919 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Isn't that what compilation-finish-function and > >> compilation-finish-functions are for? > > > That's either an oversight or they are implementation details and not > > meant to be used. > > Not all the hooks are documented in dosctrings. Maybe they should, but > until then I recommend checking the elisp code (or apropos > "foo-.*-\(hook\|functions?\)"). I wonder why that didn't occur to me. Hmmm. Thanks. Even so, this wouldn't have worked in this case either since I would have used "compile" for "foo", not "compilation". That the prefix is compilation instead of compile is perhaps a topic for another day ;-). -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.