From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why isn't the string returned by symbol-name read-only? Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:19:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27293923.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <4B5B6250.1080108@censorshipresearch.org> <15016.128.165.0.81.1264295537.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264332016 17382 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2010 11:20:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:20:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 24 12:20:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZ0Vk-0007tX-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZ0Vl-0004Ox-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZ0Vb-0004OM-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZ0VV-0004Ns-FQ for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56730 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZ0VV-0004Np-7a for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:36949) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ0VU-0000HF-Ii for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:19:52 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ0VS-0003ww-Og for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:19:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: <15016.128.165.0.81.1264295537.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120321 Archived-At: Thanks. Davis Herring wrote: > > So it's purely an optimization; it's not meant > to protect anything. > > Davis > > -- > This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or > too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during > shipping. > > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Why-isn%27t-the-string-returned-by-symbol-name-read-only--tp27289855p27293923.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.