From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: interactive? Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:32:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27210523.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263821542 29808 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2010 13:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:32:22 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 18 14:32:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NWriI-00031V-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:32:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NWriJ-000427-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NWriC-00041e-Em for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NWri9-00040R-0S for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46030 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NWri8-00040O-Qc for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:45666) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NWri8-0000Vx-DA for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NWri6-0001c9-9V for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:32:02 -0800 X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120200 Archived-At: I do not understand the use of (interactive ) (defun x (n) (interactive "P") n) (symbol-function 'x) (lambda (n) (interactive "P") n) I see that it is added to lambda-expression, but what is the effect of evaluation from minibuffer or from inside some code? Where in the evaluator one makes the diff between interactive and non-interactive? Please, can somebody explain me what is the implementation of interactive, from the moment where it is read up to evaluating ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/interactive--tp27210523p27210523.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.