From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:23:09 +0000 Message-ID: <271290d7aa1041b9df56@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7952"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 13:26:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOJdG-0001wa-LA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:26:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOJdF-0008A9-Jy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOJaU-0006NN-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:40504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOJaR-0004YI-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 08:23:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616415789; bh=qIMZ7J/GOQ1yGivgCfbxMcGRtpA8g4Dj2nP2Pzy5pPc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=XhM174Sizm8yopb6WLyaqGdnjK7SWLPi3l7/1Q36Ru2aNGXRI1xUHZRkYBhG7pRQE 9qNhep9AzFHTKr2B/xMZOOimo3HAt5TKS1jp5x+HzXbmF/CPvhYByZjNJ+TaKK+V9R Ygxsssv01ceUKgirHNT4eATgolDF4Amnk0RCheXADHauWz1pdARmJRl/AHrN+BDLM/ FsCHMKPbyg/YeKwFWWIYn+0Ejsae+EpgpTWHiLXxoayOj5QVJpWBcYyImsDxi1nQMN XxGVgCABWUp7hW2PEcK3qlg2qBvV+Wvdnnb7PUq4Pxzm6gX18VdY0ILXxcPk6f/heD UsTPHuj+n5GDw== In-Reply-To: <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266750 Archived-At: >> Well... the suggested experiment does not remove C-o, it changes C-o in >> a way that is, I believe, painless. > > Sorry; I didn't read the patch carefully. So it basically moves `C-o' > to `C-o C-o' (and makes the `C-o' prefix open for new commands)? > Yes and yes. > > I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this > would be annoying or not for users. Any `C-o' users who have an opinion > here? > I think we won't really know without experimenting.