From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:49:40 +0200 Message-ID: <26654541-7f3e-4274-022d-935246358681@yandex.ru> References: <4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87vb4zb0i4.fsf@gnu.org> <837fheuu6a.fsf@gnu.org> <83twkiteb3.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5utbxb.fsf@gnu.org> <56DDD02A.20809@cs.ucla.edu> <83fuw2t2ue.fsf@gnu.org> <56DE0F6A.6010207@cs.ucla.edu> <83pov5rmt6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DFD78F.40205@cs.ucla.edu> <94ebd24f-6d23-680c-3c7b-e10f30118396@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457549425 5177 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 18:50:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 19:50:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adjBN-0000ck-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:50:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adjBM-0002vS-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adjB5-0002ut-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adjB1-0005Iq-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]:38267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adjB1-0005Im-NP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l68so83960342wml.1 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:49:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oWksqy5SX4+okg8+KwF+MRLqeiVjCr4stjCjdQG5eGI=; b=FnWpUypFTronDpcQ2NSsom11n18CpHQ+Le7i7tyGEFd5AOksxXvqeCzvul+2SQOaZy j3zcp0Qx58h0FrGDbWN2iK9euJTHPwprJeCZEEr4wX/6etDbQFpjHkCOxLwVwR5g977e ngc5LDTj4kYaYZy0eOfdIOzi6lTmYHxLsPUJV8dOd8mlkxI1jctktC3vU6nUpUPbzBI+ uKcZT1z9pGFD/V0O75g3q+vgzATaGktv7RX4keS1QBhBxPZ+4LvQTZbHh0pKGtlJLcxy q+YPWUqXPL9fGFUYo2ZMX4WW9T1hGasjnP7cmc0UAFOIrUHPzLGqG463dH2pEd6hYdHu oVhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oWksqy5SX4+okg8+KwF+MRLqeiVjCr4stjCjdQG5eGI=; b=jsTdVNiZkfKh8Na9PGTkdLg51ezBm0aB48uE8KvfcX8aUz5HHVlI+SeCo1JyEXxxUa KVfNXkv8ZtbPhqEZOaMMkrE4QUCJQtGCRjQ7ZoP1up/8GxHK+89D+jQmTK266fKBdcPR FVo0fOynqRw9yJeqLfAJoJ8CqGSYfzxR+Mc6guTtylrO9SKH7L4iwtKpmsKwZyfSgq71 xiCmtVX4JIgxUxlvoWqLfDjDRGn//PVFesqheID7kr+SVNTybiziQjReityc1cuWmD/U xD3cnfsFzMJR/Hq8/t7SZQWGCuX3PN7gDwpd7VNuc6VsNOsX7AiBUpjuUPkMN/SgKvC0 ctJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLo3fvcu+2l6s6Ax+4tuKWhqlfesoBOrJlYm+CQqTSkL+y9BBY9VkijBWrzQgXLnA== X-Received: by 10.194.249.42 with SMTP id yr10mr37177520wjc.12.1457549382915; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:49:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e25sm17186229wmi.21.2016.03.09.10.49.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:49:42 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201281 Archived-At: On 03/09/2016 08:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Making vc-git-expanded-log-entry look for and show a corresponding entry >> from the fixes file shouldn't be particularly hard. > > But what about vc-print-log and vc-region-history? vc-print-log - only if we make it use the same format as vc-print-root-log, which isn't not a terrible solution (it'll improve UI consistency). vc-region-history - probably not, if we can't use the same approach for messages as above. Although we could hack something with jit-lock... > Doable in Elisp, yes, but how hard, and at what performance cost? With the above caveats, not too hard, and shouldn't be too slow either. Although if we could co-opt git notes after all, it would be even easier to just ask Git to show them together with commit messages. But that's something Someone should investigate.