From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexandre Garreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp LSP Server Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:48:16 +0200 Message-ID: <2633134.5Dx47gdOxA@galex-713.eu> References: <16338bdc2497fc51c6fb6d54ab370bfb@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <2086087.T8BPgQIYYX@galex-713.eu> <87ee8ralew.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 12:49:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZss0-0007Xu-2S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:49:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZsry-0006N4-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZsr1-0005H3-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from portable.galex-713.eu ([2a00:5884:8305::1]:51700 helo=galex-713.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZsqz-00035o-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from gal by galex-713.eu with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZsqv-0007Jw-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:48:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ee8ralew.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8305::1; envelope-from=galex-713@galex-713.eu; helo=galex-713.eu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276735 Archived-At: Le lundi 11 octobre 2021, 12:46:47 CEST Po Lu a =C3=A9crit : > Alexandre Garreau writes: > > Seeing those regular discussions about anti-freedom interoperability > > (while usually interoperability is a user freedom), I still hope that > > there is a solution, such as copyleft was decades ago=E2=80=A6 and can= =E2=80=99t help > > but think that if SSPL is juridically sound, it could help so (like, > > extending copyleft beyond dynamic linking, to general inter-process > > communication and services). Has FSF advanced on that subject? >=20 > AFAIU, the FSF considers the SSPL a proprietary software license. >=20 > I don't understand the specifics though, and it would be nice if someone > explained. Thanks in advance :) Where did you read that? I still can=E2=80=99t see it mentioned in licenses/ licenses-list, and last time I asked they said me they were still=20 reviewing it