From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-reference-face no longer defined? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:46:15 -0700 Message-ID: <25380.57495.56006.25514@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9381"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, mardani29@yahoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 22:48:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIGG-0002JM-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 22:48:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIGF-0004rc-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIEB-0003Hu-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]:45738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIE9-0005h9-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id 9so11228754pfz.12 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:46:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:date:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=09wzk+kKW5UXCjYonRVZYvmjM3slXRqAkuUIihz+d8s=; b=FKCpI8ZdtwBFqhEb+ogL3U+KDK7RmA+BfBSNV8kcQNCvpzHI11XaWvOvclU1uy7jEa dSMEBuAujzYW/2jD6Yze0tK6GDxaDuGUbdVz/Kz7DjllbC6NxaD+xSZe9P3otQnIFbec p703ZvPu223+2xpX5x5YaJhaecNRgJZg/M1CHnt5Ey62rgszKNoMsa01rQqgYILNqpdD OZ10QL5k//X30cBJWsx8HXU1LTUGxebrL2NqZKXSGgy6qmFfM4z8Qa6ZZiBi5lGnYGHY 0AaBD3HI9uJjr3dzRB9L0iiokXJzV3cFwkVRaNNGyZh1lzyuyZlNaXbFHr6k8QKESTgl pG+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:date:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date; bh=09wzk+kKW5UXCjYonRVZYvmjM3slXRqAkuUIihz+d8s=; b=JymPbGYzOXjVd7BEWBFu0Jn/uIYJL5Zh0VShDLWscBnq5h9gUlHzJ3jTd9iewm5gnV sMwL0ouP9BR/vmAjXPg4co0hmywx3hkQgMs7zh8YJ8hD0VdHeCgm/9BkrJN282Yj1//p GrR87F/V1FQYlzunxiYJbccQElcybt4l+K/B0DdFrIWlo7kF7NZNzOmoxklfKr3QCxVl h9oug5e4CzoIrswWwFmB1TCzCPLFKD2iV6Hje3MbW2Q9ygIOW+ifqG8NT1cyGWKd2NDD VxcKO3w/fwZKb+ic+lkR4qF4X2WRN/z/z0JbJyDXD18QUTsjoAefWxVjHdnJjH26/TrK p92g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3jQb/3PxIqVb6lFQsKZM6ueJsdzHJluiuyV2L7UoMM2YlVUSg4 FlP6+slY/HBpZDCKlD2uzpMF/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7IP+vyikcYViygld78JEAF1lNJ3U5g/ThUXa9inZgwhLn3JoQZBMCCOqJjGgTBfZ9lz4xG+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2289:b0:546:8fef:1bec with SMTP id f9-20020a056a00228900b005468fef1becmr7031303pfe.17.1663361176974; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1000:1612:6ce9:b0e2:18d0:35c4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129-20020a620487000000b0053e984a887csm15194097pfe.96.2022.09.16.13.46.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::429; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pf1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -193 X-Spam_score: -19.4 X-Spam_bar: ------------------- X-Spam_report: (-19.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.816, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295504 Archived-At: thx, apologies for the noise, rgrep didn't tell me those were in comments, and I was too lazy to check;-) Stefan Monnier writes: > > File: lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el > > 6060 8 ;; =09=09 font-lock-reference-face > > 6067 8 ;; =09=09 font-lock-reference-face >=20 > Notice: inside a comment (and AFAIK that commented code doesn't actu= ally > use that face, it just says what to do in case that face shows up). >=20 > > File: lisp/progmodes/cc-fonts.el >=20 > That's the CC-mode I was referring to. >=20 > > File: etc/themes/deeper-blue-theme.el > > 74 6 `(font-lock-reference-face ((,class (:foreground "Ligh= tCoral")))) > > > > File: etc/themes/whiteboard-theme.el > > 54 6 `(font-lock-reference-face ((,class (:foreground "salm= on")))) >=20 > These two themes just define the face, i.e. say what to do in case s= ome > third party uses it. Notice how `whiteboard-theme` also defines the= > appearance of `realgud-*` faces, which aren't defined in Emacs. > We could remove those "references", but I see no urgency. >=20 >=20 > Stefan --=20 Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) =E2=99=89 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE -- Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) ♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮