From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bob Rogers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: gmail+SMTP(only) (oauth2) Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:18:05 -0400 Message-ID: <25220.7965.62342.930867@orion.rgrjr.com> References: <87wnek5d9c.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 18 00:18:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nr5Wh-0006Dv-Ht for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:18:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr5Wg-0003MX-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 18:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr5W7-0002eD-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 18:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rgrjr.com ([69.164.211.47]:43932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nr5W5-0006ba-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 18:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rgrjr.com (c-73-16-206-7.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.16.206.7]) by rgrjr.com (Postfix on openSUSE) with ESMTP id 4A0891D6BBE; Tue, 17 May 2022 22:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from orion.rgrjr.com (orion.rgrjr.com [192.168.0.3]) by scorpio.rgrjr.com (Postfix on openSUSE GNU/Linux) with ESMTP id F32D65FEB0; Tue, 17 May 2022 18:18:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wnek5d9c.fsf@mat.ucm.es> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 29.0.50 Received-SPF: none client-ip=69.164.211.47; envelope-from=rogers-emacs@rgrjr.homedns.org; helo=rgrjr.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289882 Archived-At: From: Uwe Brauer Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:34:39 +0200 Hi Today I got the unofficial approval to forward my email to an account of my choice, if I can't access my mail with TLS (SSL or the gmail app password anymore) However I have been warned that the message should have a from field with a domain of my university. (@mat.ucm.es for example). Now I could either use 1. The smtpmail (or sendmail) program of my linux machine (not sure about MacOS I have implemented this for my own domains (principally rgrjr.com) for over a year now with acceptable results. The only catch is that emails forwarded from Google have to be relayed through a VPS in order to avoid my ISP's embargo on port 25, since Google does not offer forwarding to an arbitrary port. But this setup should work just as well for a domain for which you are not the admin, and will give you complete control over how to process messages on your home GNU/Linux system. And the setup for outgoing email is no different than before. . . . In any case I have been warned that my mails could be blacklisted. Anybody has experience with such a service/setting? Regards Uwe Brauer My emails do have some tendency to end up in peoples' spam folders. But whether that's more or less than for other senders (including some GMail clients who have tried to send to me) is harder to say. -- Bob Rogers http://www.rgrjr.com/