From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 07:21:32 -0700 Message-ID: <24683.7404.791668.929210@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> <8735w7y98k.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtue5f6x.fsf@tcd.ie> <8735w5rh3s.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7kl19qj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3006"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tsdh@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 16:23:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTQ8A-0000eu-Ph for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:23:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTQ89-0006nG-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTQ6m-00060H-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]:43908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTQ6i-00031B-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id x21-20020a17090a5315b029012c4a622e4aso5931965pjh.2 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 07:21:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=Hgc3B58+HGInprWqvP7qUySEsU/XfpNqfzdqPLr2nyQ=; b=CBq+j++UFoaLomwGCe0QU5zf8xZsOBt4g4zWpd/5ysH/IIxOg0+10GPorqxCo91BZ8 oNekoBiLxph9At+R1DEdrqrBnB4Uae0IK8A00+avH/ymcNysqDgp6TdcyO/QD0yAbW/7 EvPMx5yCN70Q9+Zrv5wLEp9QdzOMJjSq+zVpwqxV9rgS9+nvMFP+Z+7D3yCtwDXvUYzp zDnjJuZYHYzkxL+AWZz6vVHXLP/crr2XXGqz0p0zLCYOwjyDjyBLBEL6rwMtegld3vF2 T1G65Cdt7bfMgEfyFOz/pgp0YNIELbTNJgo5xZjhQkHCPjmXRyUvfhEwc3KREVcGgzUq fVBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=Hgc3B58+HGInprWqvP7qUySEsU/XfpNqfzdqPLr2nyQ=; b=PQYdRkJYLYV0e3CfUmPfksYD2NuLqxhHuVewO2kpL8TU9B5MCFI18gPv0bScoGkR16 8RHGA7Vj7J5chCGdGiK19Nmzd4teAu85xrS62/DWRxlf9l96BKgh0H+30ahtWpkHFA8N mF6rAEITfZbrWODer+IBvJHJkSmMU8xLoZobvwbxDSOBhYFh9AI+4d5aU1mMby8QTnlL xQujp9q1CqNglhFkMwPFaJhk75bYrfPQYt7wwVoGnsVEGRV0vvRbjUQBx/hpQvI6Jn3x +luHaDBwfO7QA4SYjberj+d235fkv4/VEFkH6mDuoyPTCcWxOV/pJbLsYZw5SnToxmMI EnTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lvVTnlYrbRmYNlJSJVHGVJwALeM89eVS7lGvr+GDdzPA6PJ6o rdXbEq+fTsSlr/6mAyMGWMEQgvWcy5CuBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpBz606cvgpn4obBjO9p06sw/hXjuB3oePfP/MCQ84YGQDA26Ld8ZoWVyj/o9Ma8gjS/bUdg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d3d8:: with SMTP id d24mr27034277pjw.28.1617632494564; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 07:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1000:1510:357b:863:8a:e957]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82sm16871844pfv.19.2021.04.05.07.21.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Apr 2021 07:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by retriever.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 13930) id CAD9E180020C; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87h7kl19qj.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pj1-x102a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267413 Archived-At: Likely not worth combining this with ido then:-) Tassilo Horn writes: > "T.V Raman" writes: >=20 > > I use ido and ido-completing-read+ and just tried this new packag= e, was > > But installing it from elpa and enabling it as documented made no > > perceptible difference in the minibuffer with commands like find-f= ile, >=20 > Indeed, it doesn't do anything when ido is enabled. The reason is t= hat > it only adds its manchinery if `minibuffer-completion-table' is non-= nil > which seemed to be the right thing to check that we read something > completable from the minibuffer. With ido enabled, it is always nil= , at > least for `find-file' and `switch-to-buffer'. >=20 > That said, I'm not sure if it would be a useful extension to enable > together with ido. With ido, you already see (some) possible > completions, and ido also doesn't complete with stock > `minibuffer-complete' as `aggressive-completion-mode' does but it ha= s > its own `ido-complete' which also tracks state important for ido suc= h as > the current directory... >=20 > Bye, > Tassilo --=20 =E2=99=89Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE=E2=99=89 -- ♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉