From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings? Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:49 -0700 Message-ID: <24436.58533.871640.683323@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <24436.53239.437810.270641@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <24436.58187.698211.262192@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14397"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: npostavs@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 30 22:05:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNiLi-0003bw-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:05:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNiLg-0003l3-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNiKV-0002uR-C1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]:33822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNiKS-0007XG-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id k13so1977635pfg.1 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=eoRC9rCZIaJ1rrk/D9mPzbT6ybNEO2Pgv1EHq35o/4E=; b=Z6yqiFUc45bJRrQPHhhRFuXzKO1aEVWuEDCwgj1ep3pjuZ/wr70SfKRHq3fcxc/8WE qi4d8Gboly4iVSKMugF4faJxUTFDhJFH7QXbcULU9+Rq0jYl/LgRnscdPYijbNWXpuPG CS0rgvOVmDvVErQ3+S1fzW3EDY+DCAjg1zDF6K9TDEq0Wnoaw1ThaOu5uGhmtgUq9+7U 0Vaa/hkswbO7O63DvmDsJUv5uA6WFnyqH5G7GlP+KPlU2PKkE2oYPy8+AhnDjPTBvq4W z65zybWurOc2ybgblrfwvi4X8qiCL2rZy648GWdCPrvZF7eQh2qW9qGx8iTxF+Ve7etc jbwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=eoRC9rCZIaJ1rrk/D9mPzbT6ybNEO2Pgv1EHq35o/4E=; b=a2+/3xDQzanvEjKw77I5fv3x8d1XRaOAW+343/5H03LP9wOPcXUrmMCMhimgdar+eT LWqDWIx8iXrATR+C5GJFJw3yCJkuJvP8Jufvd6D1GUi7LlNPZNUy2+qAUUgKs8bdIekt mJiJ4/SfLYOTN2rw2zxHOIy61XvNPnkguN7qDSlSBMa1thmbMwGFJPPsjjiRfTMX7kOk PCkMnAUlpvObnlF+PK0t3vfryR0YCGUuvVlpcL7qsN6FzTflL/gn7YiVerlVGH8Mz/jo qHDVurYqOR+f5LjWzmrGTlg5Owi/gMBX4tK2kL5qr3w8iy6lrfSYiuM+d3gMkg6cT4ks ifmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UO/A65fqSrMSt2iF8TTL3+vl+Q1NoBpQBGkCb2QiUmuFBail4 l3NX0SDkIoan6uBGacoJiQCxBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJCohC2hH8W6kn/7gBGro6bcDOVBq8k3I+/pSeKyXeIR5z4Y9E2eG+vcbYoTghc2WW07KDAw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:4e8a:0:b029:13c:1611:653b with SMTP id c132-20020a624e8a0000b029013c1611653bmr1122234pfb.13.1601496232806; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com ([172.22.80.201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm3565669pfk.19.2020.09.30.13.03.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by retriever.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 13930) id E6B3F18003B0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::433; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pf1-x433.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -180 X-Spam_score: -18.1 X-Spam_bar: ------------------ X-Spam_report: (-18.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256798 Archived-At: :-) I was merely proposing C-z z for suspend to make up for taking away C-z Noam Postavsky writes: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 15:58, T.V Raman wrote: >=20 > > that's an interesting perspective. Am surprized that you feel tty= > > users would find C-z z significantly harder than just C-z as the k= ey > > to suspend Emacs. >=20 > C-x C-z is already bound to suspend, works fine in tty (and is easie= r > than C-z z, IMO). --=20 =E2=99=89Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE=E2=99=89 -- ♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉