From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 12:30:08 +1000 Message-ID: <233B1E4D-DA1F-40B8-A261-0C4A1EFE34D0@scratch.space> References: <969FAA27-5E74-4703-9BED-681C4616F26E@scratch.space> <20180522190450.GA35196@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527042534 2916 195.159.176.226 (23 May 2018 02:28:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 02:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Alan Third Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 23 04:28:50 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLJWE-0000cs-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 04:28:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLJYL-0004QA-9G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 22:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLJXh-0004Og-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 22:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLJXd-000311-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 22:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:43647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLJXd-00030H-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 22:30:17 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 123.243.244.176 Original-Received: from epi.local (123-243-244-176.tpgi.com.au [123.243.244.176]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FEAB40005; Wed, 23 May 2018 04:30:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180522190450.GA35196@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.194 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225584 Archived-At: > Alan Third writes: >=20 > Van L writes: >>=20 >>> George Plymale II writes: >>>=20 >>> in the NS port >>=20 >> Can the Emacs 26.1 release document readme steps for likely best >> results building your own NS port? >=20 > What sort of thing do you have in mind? Something to improve and explain the configure options specific to a = great experience on the platform. I use the following by ritural trial = and error and don=E2=80=99t know why. I couldn=E2=80=99t put the = sicp.info file in /usr/share/info despite su-ing and don=E2=80=99t know = why. #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE CC=3Dclang ./configure \ --disable-acl \ --prefix=3D"$HOME/2018/Applications" \ --with-xpm \ --with-jpeg \ --with-tiff \ --with-gif \ --with-png \ --with-xml2 \ --with-imagemagick \ --with-xft \ --with-libotf \ --with-ns \ --with-zlib \ --without-selinux \ --without-gpm \ --without-dbus \ --without-gsettings \ --without-libsystemd \ --with-mailutils \ --with-x \ --with-x-toolkit=3D"lucid" \ # --without-compress-install \ # --without-x \ # --disable-ns-self-contained \ # --without-gnutls \ # --with-modules \ #+END_EXAMPLE >> and mention the Mac port. >=20 > Seems unlikely given it=E2=80=99s not part of GNU Emacs. Detailing where and why Mac port does better than the GNU Emacs sets a = target to better.