From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: jasonr@btinternet.com
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Gtk version getting closer
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:21:03 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <2315601.1036747263418.JavaMail.root@127.0.0.1>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036748281 3459 80.91.224.249 (8 Nov 2002 09:38:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18A5aR-0000tO-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:37:59 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18A5jq-00023R-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:47:43 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A5YN-0005XI-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 04:35:51 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A5K9-0001xF-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 04:21:09 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A5K6-0001t6-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 04:21:07 -0500
Original-Received: from actinium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.66])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A5K5-0001rU-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 04:21:05 -0500
Original-Received: from germanium ([194.75.226.53])
	by actinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 18A5K3-0004en-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:21:03 +0000
Original-Received: from 193.192.75.200 by germanium ([194.75.226.53]); Fri, 08 Nov 02 09:21:03 GMT
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
X-Mailer: talk21.com WAS v2
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9248
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9248

> Personally, I would prefer if we could release 21.3, make a new branch 
> for 21.4, and then you could merge the Gtk support for 21.5 (or whatever
> it will be called at that time)...

I don't think we want to make MORE branches. If it is not judged safe
enough to go in 21.4, then it should go straight into the unicode branch IMO. 
We clearly don't have enough resources to keep two new feature branches
and one maintenance branch going at once. I think it is better to
concentrate our non-bugfixing efforts on the unicode branch after
21.4 is released if we want to see it released this decade.