From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:14:35 +0000 Message-ID: <22aaf0faddb09c3b4b24@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4n9jei.fsf@gnu.org> <271290d7aac58f2f9e96@heytings.org> <83czvr9hvc.fsf@gnu.org> <271290d7aa69bbcaa204@heytings.org> <83lfae8fbg.fsf@gnu.org> <22aaf0fadd0894af49d9@heytings.org> <83v99i6ink.fsf@gnu.org> <22aaf0fadd0870c0e9f8@heytings.org> <22aaf0fadda0f9d9bc03@heytings.org> <22aaf0fadda0bd53c594@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9937"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 23 23:31:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOpZ6-0002UK-Ga for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:31:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOpZ5-0006re-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOpIO-0004ka-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:14:41 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:42670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOpIM-0002A7-0V; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:14:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616537675; bh=vNyg+bu6X0otMaXeYvGFErBvsBUfFJ6ovU2Cpzv3Bpg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=q5cD1YaNxizezTus0U+WTyiQN5GTsRfFvasy6iWRR04y6rLM1bzDTHBf40qJvQS0f AMUu61yAfGE3atWKduBIooFzf6sIzoUeJLq+3Z//auSI7r9gy0Ft1mAF+5RDYhb6bO zLAf0lB/UVvIi572JEvqo2YA0K9wxn9h++XQAm5dRxKp5eYSmXPtWIOVnj41uWnA2c zZNWdebPDm9Lb7MZkG9EpeuU/7nhuf+mKvF8HyPzQcCNW26WqP7ZDl59HXjIANcIAQ FLmRYFlLmOOaauU0zgdxehZt30Ofpu1G3MMlcNp+E3ZUGw4JH+YNuOFmHGmJqwrBxT LP3rwHcD1diOQ== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266900 Archived-At: >>> It does exactly the same thing it does today. >> >> No it didn't. > > I stand by my claim, maybe you should login on an ITS machine before > trying to contradict someone who uses the system on a semi-regular > basis? > I gave a quote of the 1981 manual written by RMS, for "EMACS version 161" (AIM memo 554), which everyone can download and read. It's very well possible that C-o was changed in version 162.