From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:18:03 +0100 Message-ID: <22B458AB-4ADC-498F-A452-90763439DE66@swipnet.se> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <87384qzxqy.fsf@igel.home> <83bnjen71r.fsf@gnu.org> <83twx6a7wm.fsf@gnu.org> <83sicq1cvt.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2y21b9n.fsf@gnu.org> <87d23uchvd.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83a8yx1tgw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427530721 16035 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2015 08:18:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 08:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 09:18:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yblwp-0005vJ-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:18:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yblwo-0001V9-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 04:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yblwd-0001V1-6W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 04:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yblwc-0007Tb-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 04:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe05.swip.net ([212.247.154.129]:41162 helo=swip.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YblwX-0007RZ-NR; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 04:18:09 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 579492228; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:18:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83a8yx1tgw.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.247.154.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184441 Archived-At: Hi. > 28 mar 2015 kl. 08:17 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >=20 > How many people even use vc-next-action these days? IOW, would it be > okay to make it work very differently for modern dVCSes than what it > does now? >=20 > For example, in a Git repository where "git status" shows nothing, > vc-next-action invoked without an argument currently says "Fileset is > up-to-date" and does nothing, which is IMO less than useful. Would > someone mind if it suggested a "git pull" instead? How do you commit without vc-next-action in vc? I would assume people = use it all the time. Jan D.