From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olivier Certner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: POLL: make C-x o transient Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <2271474.Kj97tzTlbN@ravel> References: <2EFBBE54-62F4-4373-82D6-DC8750B648BA@kuaishou.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: aitor , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 11:47:58 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Lt7-0009Y3-RW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:47:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Lt6-00064e-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:47:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4LqG-0004Dn-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6]:37578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4LqA-00056M-8A; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ravel.localnet (unknown [90.116.215.75]) (Authenticated sender: ocert.dev@free.fr) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 955F978033D; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:44:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1611657889; bh=VcOUhsyfulD7pnyqMO3x/lsf+X2KpLqciGTBu56fAjI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dcf02ZT3wbfk9rkr9r6a2fqhw5NeeCXW3ZTw0asqvmdo3/4rnZXpybV2cGPSINQBr zrF9SRNOszcbJ49T0t6MiTQuZEJGW3VP3Wygogj2N44RQPelbfI3/IFbifyZ6hYbs5 pMb4dtFpO8XIweyLkVwQ/3812TbfeCNaaLEstQcHkf3qXtQlW9suz221yxr8B5bWPi hMsZypCaitRG62MJ419eAub0rImYKaKTbyeCGGxtDL23RJ4qJ1cKOV0zs4UfIDaAPB uFAfYDmvQH6A8h8/8RgHl4h4mfKeGbbyYAt6MqGquzdgD6WkDkPdRav860L/I0h4We 6JqiKPs9grLpA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.27.42.6; envelope-from=ocert.dev@free.fr; helo=smtp6-g21.free.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263452 Archived-At: Hi, > Those two have current bindings in the same spirit: previous-buffer > and next-buffer. Which ones are better, I have no opinion. These commands are also available through C-x C- and C-x C- by default. Personally, I find these commands less useful than those for changing the current window. I've been happy for a long which with rebinding C-x and C-x , especially given the existence of the abovementioned alternative shortcuts to `previous-buffer' and `next-buffer'. Regards. -- Olivier Certner