From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexandre Garreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contradictiory directions Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <2180057.NHp2fHvxes@galex-713.eu> References: <20211211035614.15517.53830@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <6425211.HdX0WEmjLp@galex-713.eu> <87k0g54uda.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10470"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 16 06:13:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxj5B-0002aU-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:13:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxj5A-0003Ye-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxj4I-0002EP-UT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:5884:8305::1] (port=56068 helo=galex-713.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxj4H-0007CL-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from gal by galex-713.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxj4B-0001SC-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:12:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0g54uda.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:5884:8305::1 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8305::1; envelope-from=galex-713@galex-713.eu; helo=galex-713.eu X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282111 Archived-At: Le merkredo, 15-a de decembro 2021, 19-a horo kaj 4:49 CET =C3=93scar Fuent= es a=20 =C3=A9crit : > Alexandre Garreau writes: >=20 >=20 >=20 > > Le merkredo, 15-a de decembro 2021, 13-a horo kaj 44:48 CET =C3=93scar > > Fuentes > > a =C3=A9crit : >=20 >=20 > >> The scenario of someone sneaking in a non-free SQLite extension > >> against > >> the user's wishes is a bit far-fetched, to say the least. So we are > >> wasting a lot of energy worrying about how to effectively > >> inconvenience > >> our users for "protecting" them from an unlikely event no matter how > >> much limitations are imposed on the feature being discussed. I > >> thought > >> that the gcc/llvm debacle would be understood at this point. >=20 >=20 >=20 > > Many systems have been showed to disrespect users=E2=80=99 choice that = way. >=20 > [Citation needed] Well why do you think proprietary platforms avoid the GPL? it may just as well be because some library is tivoized, or a thing like=20 that