From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:24:19 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <2110-Wed04Jun2003182418+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <200306041404.h54E4SO30552@f7.net> <200306041501.h54F1Tq3025762@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054740851 27051 80.91.224.249 (4 Jun 2003 15:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: karl@freefriends.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 04 17:34:10 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19NaHC-00072A-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19NaYp-0004cQ-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:52:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19NaHd-0005tz-4m for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NaDP-0004gM-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NaCD-0003pl-KS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Na8O-0002HD-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky (cable-131-110.inter.net.il [213.8.131.110]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id ATV11894; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:23:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200306041501.h54F1Tq3025762@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14693 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14693 > From: "Stefan Monnier" > Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:01:29 -0400 > > I don't understand what's the problem. How many users currently > actively use node names ? From what I can tell, these seem to be mostly > used internally, much like URLs in HTML. I'm not sure that's true. The `g' command, for example, accepts node names (with completion) and is an effective way of going if you know where, or remember the initial word(s) of the node name. Please don't take the above as meaning that I suggest to restore the node names' display. But let's not exaggerate the situation even if we need that to make a point. > After all there are other Info readers, besides `info' > and `emacs' and they don't necessarily look alike. The other readers aren't GNU software, so we don't have to describe them in the Texinfo manual.