From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs digest, Vol 1 #508 - 12 msgs Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:10:26 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <2110-Mon25Mar2002221025+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <3099-Sat23Mar2002115331+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200203251629.g2PGT4s13115@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017087441 10516 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 20:17:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pau8-0002jV-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16pb2J-0005lN-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:25:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16patl-00048h-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: from freya.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.14]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16parK-00040P-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:14:26 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-223-54.inter.net.il [213.8.223.54]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BHC65239; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:13:55 +0200 (IST) Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <200203251629.g2PGT4s13115@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2198 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2198 > From: "Stefan Monnier" > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:29:04 -0500 > > > What is the reason for this change in src/Makefile.in? Are you > > saying that the default value of PURESIZE is large enough to load > > *.el files in source form? > > > > - /* Build a temacs with a sufficiently large PURESIZE to load the > > - Lisp files from loadup.el in source form. */ > > - > > - bootstrap-temacs: > > - LC_ALL=C $(MAKE) $(MFLAGS) temacs ALL_CFLAGS="$(ALL_CFLAGS) -DPURESIZE=5000000 -I../src" > > - > > Overflowing the pure area is not a problem. It's only a performance > issue, which is irrelevant during bootstrap. Check my patch to > alloc.c committed around the same time. Sorry, I still don't understand. Can you please epxlain in a few more words? The comment in Makefile.in seems to indicate that more pure storage is needed for loading *.el files--are you saying that the comment is inaccurate? Btw, the change in alloc.c makes the comment immediately preceding check_pure_size, the function you've changed, inaccurate: it still says we signal an error. > I think it'd be a bug if compiling a .el file requires the DOC file. I thought about a (remote) possibility that someone needs to run the half-bootstrapped Emacs to debug or investigate some problem. If they do, they might want documentation features to work. Not a big deal, obviously, but so is building DOC. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel