From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: additional improvement of Polish tutorial Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:59:23 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <2110-Fri23Aug2002185923+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <87znvtjz06.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> <87u1luyfxr.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> <200208170451.g7H4pCE08667@wijiji.santafe.edu> <87wuqpyye4.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> <200208190050.g7J0o3X09215@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200208222000.WAA01069@home.ipipan.gda.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030118351 9726 127.0.0.1 (23 Aug 2002 15:59:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl, emacs-devel@gnu.org, wierzcho@polbox.com, matwb@univ.gda.pl Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17iGq6-0002Wl-00 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:59:10 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17iHJX-0006kW-00 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:29:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17iGrK-0002ed-00; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17iGos-0002Zm-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17iGol-0002XT-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from odin.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17iGok-0002XJ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id ALW71659; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:56:54 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: rysiek@ipipan.gda.pl X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <200208222000.WAA01069@home.ipipan.gda.pl> (message from Ryszard Kubiak on Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:00:35 +0200) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6800 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6800 > From: Ryszard Kubiak > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:00:35 +0200 > > Just to give you an example of such a problem. At work, I've been using > Emacs for many years now and, in particular, ntEmacs on Windows for a > couple of years. For all this time with ntEmacs, I have not managed to > print a text in Polish with lpr-buffer properly! None of all other text > editors we exploit on Windows has problems with simply sending a text > file to a printer. The Polish characters look on paper just as they > should. Only when printed by Emacs they don't! If this problem still exists, please tell the details. I don't see any reason why you shouldn't be able to print Polish text with lpr-buffer. Does it help to type "C-x RET c latin-2 RET" immediately before "M-x lpr-buffer RET"? What happens if you use cp1250 instead of latin-2?