From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:34:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <21008147.1159571218555258195.JavaMail.www@wwinf4616> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218555284 31415 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 15:34:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 17:35:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSvuH-0000ca-TZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:35:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57351 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvtL-0005RU-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvt7-0005J7-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvt6-0005Hz-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59837 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvt5-0005Hv-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2.voila.fr ([193.252.22.175]:24114 helo=smtp1.voila.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSvt5-0001Cn-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4106.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 41DB25800288; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:34:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4616 (wwinf4616 [10.232.13.60]) by mwinf4106.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 31CD85800282; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:34:18 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080812153418204.31CD85800282@mwinf4106.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [85.9.55.98] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-me-spamlevel: not-spam X-me-spamrating: 40.000000 X-me-spamcause: OK, (-100)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrvdejvddrfeekucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuoehnohhnvgeqnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102345 Archived-At: > >>> No, there is no contradiction in what I say. > >> Are you sure? Didn't you say that the developers you know do not use= =20 > >> Emacs on Windows because there are better software for their purpose o= n=20 > >> Windows? And didn't you mean that you trust them? > >=20 > > If you think at the definition of "good-better-best" from _their_ > > viewpoint, there is no contradiction. >=20 > Yes, that is right. But are you not overlooking the possibility that the= =20 > software they use might be superior even if not making fast money is=20 > your goal? We are looping again. I told you: everything depends of education. No, from= my viewpoint emacs is better. But in the same time I realise that from the= ir viewpoint other editors are better. I tolerate their education. > >> Note: It looks like your mail program does something that Thunderbird= =20 > >> does not expect at all. Thunderbird does not wrap the lines when=20 > >> commenting on your text. Do you know the reason? (It takes a lot of ti= me=20 > >> that this does not work.) > > > > I am sorry, I do not understand... :( >=20 > All the text in one paragraph stays on one long line that is not=20 > wrapped. There is a commenting mark at the beginning of the line like her= e: >=20 > > Avant de prendre le volant, rep=C3=A9rez votre itin=C3=A9raire et visua= lisez le trafic ! http://itineraire.voila.fr/itineraire.html >=20 Now I see. Voila. ____________________________________________________ Avant de prendre le volant, rep=C3=A9rez votre itin=C3=A9raire et visualise= z le trafic ! http://itineraire.voila.fr/itineraire.html