From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs master + org Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: <205E87B9-66F9-4410-87AF-ADADB5E81BA2@acm.org> References: <83bkt42ifq.fsf@gnu.org> <87a68ovw0b.fsf@posteo.net> <835yjc2c6f.fsf@gnu.org> <8335eg2ao9.fsf@gnu.org> <875yjbexde.fsf@posteo.net> <83zggn2a0c.fsf@gnu.org> <03AF0800-5252-429C-86BC-85DF9DF449F9@acm.org> <83tu6v27yh.fsf@gnu.org> <6F871C02-AC26-4B89-B64B-E9F4ACACDBE7@acm.org> <83sfmf26b6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii , philipk@posteo.net, silent2600@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 10:47:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oInYu-0006Iu-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:47:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oInYt-0002uA-37 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 04:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oInTE-00051R-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 04:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail232c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.242]:54848 helo=mail37c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oInTC-0002Bd-OH; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 04:41:44 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1659429630; bh=ZnwlD6p1QbxSEd4J3KJnEuUik7eawa2sE6x5gK+vPo4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=dz93BeVEJndNnLgzpaGNYUYSvUykp/IupEZvX5O3DRaB/srYYbZ3wAx/7YnH/4sTl hT1GJtP00BHABpLOdI8CiThMT6j1nIhFkQkgbzvckfr/gCK7k5cbOjOh6Lk4xbi1kf 5iZmYLvT9bLbIUX270yj2SSRL4+FOabQIG7P3Cv8= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150.188-179.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.188.179] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail37c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 2728eAS8038207; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 08:40:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F25.62E8E2FD.009E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.10.242; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail37c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292970 Archived-At: 2 aug. 2022 kl. 10.28 skrev Stefan Monnier : > With some exceptions, of course, such as the `specbind` function = itself, > or the `record_unwind_protect_*`. I.e. functions which do nothing = else > than push something onto the specpdl. All fine as long as the specpdl level remains the same at entry and = return from a function called from Lisp. Maybe we should add an assertion for this when checking is enabled.