From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ergus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:27:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20230217182707.bsiwlesafcvkk46u@Ergus> References: <83bkluaevv.fsf@gnu.org> <871qmq7l9q.fsf@thornhill.no> <87ilg1qv71.fsf@thornhill.no> <20230217082935.waa7f473dmvbpg3d@Ergus> <87fsb4r4xf.fsf@thornhill.no> <83k00g1o0k.fsf@gnu.org> <20230217163747.yt5kizq6e4vqmqqe@Ergus> <437CB8E1-1BBA-42A8-BADE-9F729A7AC5CA@thornhill.no> <20230217180228.nzm3wsnxdkjswxiy@Ergus> <2544C83B-0E08-4E67-9349-361603871946@thornhill.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22848"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 17 19:28:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pT5T0-0005mK-1J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:28:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT5S7-0003td-4Z; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:27:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT5S3-0003tA-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:27:20 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic311-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.131.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pT5S0-0006UT-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:27:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1676658432; bh=eplWmLGw1Sba9hydA4xpbD27GVdqyjnFYR+cYzrrvQI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=pnroQ1mExEBG1MG2/bmZlSzNDs42ha2d7X/R4CRjJ32oDVo8GJELN+L0+SKn2lWUkb5b4CZx52uQo95ZNR8KrE53xrG0QYe0hsYLqcW6mVHDsmvcXXHJigIDrZ3vINETXaSpPnGH1+dhB+L5xiBc3l+yCwwDfdKPL+aNaKw1Rck3pTqFdp1uUtLAuwT0zbcfgTk4LVVkqe+7zz3plFBnLm2vIauvMaFjKnPz0m9hSN+HnE5R6K4+Vr3BKQgglEX22YGoDJV1Hrrtxq3MIxA+3Dng3OK1sZJRbY6NxgdGHKp+AzXyZE4J8k0yjTdZvGHBOX+cInvNw7GxUYgzl8oiFQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1676658432; bh=PvnjSkNLOecqmX11aAJnmYELyCZ46tWEhRXBawrhIJ+=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=phF+95aZIPooM4QqJVjC+eMVkpNCNjWwOn0CPLoRA8yB8KAxrvdQEq5QBZ7CUY4bl2VxL0zuBVVsY4/H0Nke3b7JP52Tug7Q/rf6twHPDv7KuRX+QiR43I3A/riOdTAlofLArNdcFju3o0wcXI98A2KMafTa27weLP/cPsysDb2Uv+l5SMaxRRpLsm2V7xeW0EltacWjh3kIYwrMXBA02EqRpXPsfQJhR0f/PQ9JuNKSdMXEXI1QCrVoNQ+WfxGma0QD1d69W0qvtJv0Z3c0ZobVAa+PCtjDBZ/dIkFY+7aZxnFH325lFghtE6Wsj7AK4zgDPxW8TLhWbxdyVwTTBg== X-YMail-OSG: 4Q9A5dQVM1mjo9L8aVctj1wUfTeUWiTG3JY8LrfphZNoigkTcGrcnEfZu.mF30i lxg7RN2B2g1keCt3eJHaw4gHkjflE5y87q9d3D0IdA01Obid1TcIQs2Nmc7l3QjrvA8aKmoBnrX9 atvBxpgoAIoB_EK.bVj6BieCLXOGMtaf6L7hfooNWuDYjHQhdfngACm06W4omehPhj59xsS6gqon dw7T7t9Mo5eHGy.XWpJ5DFDGkAQQ25fN1L5rAk8PLyl2eZCSwMXdou9stKhmao_0VnTKqbLW2CRP Hbu6HyKIVBxm5Iz_ZL3dthDN7GQv4o6eQdF4vcfx2N_ZFzWsB1tYYdlzK48h10e_InFD2zRcF59r 4JhGLoRHgc..C.0FP1QvavW4LQNRx1roKzHIh7TSXoENaAUHSpgOs8p4XodE8HclmNrbiu9Sssbl Q9ztMeZAuAs27U9Yc2.GVTUlCbhaGH4oXpurlt6BhYdzeT3ldJKuBHKImpoi8l2FZ1IfbqnECiTY 1qmSpicETYtcjLitJj.lOEH_smO_FuXOwVVBNn0yz_47bPaPPeheH1IdOyFob7.M8V5h_nS4lnRo 5lbtsNCpVq6cUgRjjXWjczhTYzzmVjGzZ6urcbnEmEoZxc7q4xSO.XL939SY8mz_vPCFYK171PwQ _iIhSXolPx06wR.w9z3mhAtmaiJ3fjkdm2MTMvQRkTY0cbOmfDMpfmETs0qtQSl1vlrnZaBLU_r4 7_SXP2xDA5akYL_sfYJUt1ZHf3vob96vHJFMrRv6kcjll17WzLa9sZ6K65wYjDVzXVHConiBQS7l 7MZ5yjJcY8LRkcpdGADUkwSCIoEI_b2A2nbB05deIw X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:27:12 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-ir2-65c64dfd66-fhq4t (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID bc967e3af68f4c2413d1ac53330b16ba; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2544C83B-0E08-4E67-9349-361603871946@thornhill.no> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.21183 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.aol Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.131.124; envelope-from=spacibba@aol.com; helo=sonic311-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303511 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 07:10:28PM +0100, Theodor Thornhill wrote: > > >On 17 February 2023 19:02:28 CET, Ergus wrote: > >Yep! Is there any particular style? Would pragmas be indented from the parent scope, and the next line after it be at the same level as the pragma? > >Theo > Hi: Yes, pragmas will be generally indented from the parent scope, continuation lines are usually in the same level or one level more, And then everything continues as usual: These are the common use cases I know so far: // outline pragmas #pragma bla int myfunction1() {...} int main() { // inline pragmas for functions #pragma bla bla somefunction1() // inline pragmas for function with continuation one level more #pragma bla bla\ the continuation of pragma somefunction2() // inline pragma for a block of code #pragma bla2 { this is a block as usual // nested pragma #pragma mynestedpragma bla() } } Best and thanks, Ergus