unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Some performance questions.
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 20:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230208190819.z7xwgxm5gpbzmjrz@Ergus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20230208190819.z7xwgxm5gpbzmjrz.ref@Ergus

Hi:

I have been forced to use emacs in MS-Windows and after some days
tweaking and trying I have some comments I am not sure if they are
intended, known or issues. So, I ask before creating a bug report.

I am making this comments now because I have exactly the same config on
GNU/Linux and I don't have any issue.

1) I observed important lags and delays interactively (moving cursor,
scrolling or just editing simple C++ code).

I ran the profiler and I found that 50% of the time was consumed by
flycheck's hooks. As I know flycheck is not our business, I disabled it
and continued.

2) While much better; there is still a very annoying lag. If I type
fast, the letters don't appear in the screen immediately, but come all
together after a while.

Again profile-start and this time I found that in a simple test like
editing (type, delete words, write functions), 35% of the time was consumed
by the garbage collection (Automatic GC) and other 35% by flyspell.

- So I checked the gcs-done variable and the value was not specially
different than same test on GNU/Linux.. but the time percent was much
higher.

- I disabled the flyspell for the moment as I have no other choice.

3) Now, in spite of it is much better, still there is a significant lag
(compared with GNU/Linux) which concerns me about whats going on with
the GC.

Now I get in the profiler-report:

71 45% Automatic GC
68 43% redisplay_internal
         jit-lock-function
             ...
             font-lock-fontify-keywords-region

37 23%          c-font-lock-declarations
20 12%          c-font-lock-cut-off-declarators

I have not observed such lags before on GNU/Linux, so some idea what I
may be doing wrong?

I know Eli uses MS-Windows frequently, so, any hint?

Thanks in advance,
Ergus



       reply	other threads:[~2023-02-08 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230208190819.z7xwgxm5gpbzmjrz.ref@Ergus>
2023-02-08 19:08 ` Ergus [this message]
2023-02-08 20:09   ` Some performance questions Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-08 20:15     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-08 20:56       ` Ergus
2023-02-09  6:17         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-09 13:14           ` Ergus
     [not found]           ` <20230209114928.eqpojruluur42hur@Ergus>
2023-02-09 13:46             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-09 15:45               ` Ergus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230208190819.z7xwgxm5gpbzmjrz@Ergus \
    --to=spacibba@aol.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).