From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Madhu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 07:36:57 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <20220509.073657.2026170062779857216.enometh@meer.net> References: <83h760udua.fsf@gnu.org> <20220508.235157.375709222242608593.enometh@meer.net> <83ee13voin.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: lumarzeli30@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 04:07:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnso1-0002Hb-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 May 2022 04:07:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnsnz-00032A-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 May 2022 22:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnsnV-0002LZ-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2022 22:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp6.ctinetworks.com ([205.166.61.199]:50454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnsnT-0006b0-SN; Sun, 08 May 2022 22:06:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [117.254.35.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: enometh@meer.net) by smtp6.ctinetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C3FF862CE; Sun, 8 May 2022 22:06:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ee13voin.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 29.0.50 X-ctinetworks-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ctinetworks-MailScanner-ID: 2C3FF862CE.A781F X-ctinetworks-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-ctinetworks-Watermark: 1652926010.34535@WZZjWqaAVrBrzejosYNh0Q Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.61.199; envelope-from=enometh@meer.net; helo=smtp6.ctinetworks.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289512 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii <83ee13voin.fsf@gnu.org> Wrote on Sun, 08 May 2022 21:59:44 +0300 > So are we clear about what should and does happen, or are there > still issues to be looked into in this respect? What's not clear is the behaviour of 'arfbuzz, which on my system does not match what is indicated in the discussion. This possibly affects how emacs renders the text but it wouldn't be an emacs problem.