Re: Select completions from the minibuffer

[Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:59:20PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:46:37 +0100
>> From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
>> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net
>>
>> BTW Eli:
>>
>> Some of the new and old completions customs have some name miss-matches:
>> some of them are called completion-something and some others are
>> completions-something in plural.
>>
>> There are some of them with `:group 'completion` while others don't have
>> that... could you please check if the names could be standardized and
>> may be added to the right group??
>>
>> Specially the options I added I am not sure if they are well named and
>> for sure they don't have a group name...
>
>For options just added it might be possible, but for options that
>exist for a while, I'm not sure renaming them is a good idea, or is
>even practical.
>
>For the new ones, feel free to suggest renaming.

I suggest 2 things:

1) add the group field for all of them

2) use completionS in plural and declare the old ones that are in
singular deprecated alias for the new ones... and keep them there for
the next 10 years... the intention is to make things uniform and easier
to find (either throw completions or the custom interface...)