From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Question about completion behavior
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220309161453.g3ta6sd2xqzvwcgr@Ergus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309143016.n2q3u25gat6plaxz@Ergus>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1962 bytes --]
Please give a look to the attached patch...
It adds two new values:
visible: to update when visible else do nothing (as Stefan suggested).
always: to always update or show completions (Like bash
show-all-if-ambiguous)
BTW: the lazy value is more like show-all-if-unmodified i think
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:30:16PM +0100, Ergus wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:16:17PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:46:54 +0100
>>>From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
>>>Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>>
>>>Look at the attached patch, it may need some small improve to solve the
>>>case 4. but so far it gives a consistent behavior with any value of
>>>completion-auto-help (and it is actually simpler than the current code)
>>>
>>>Alternatively we may add another custom, something like:
>>>
>>>completions-on-complete-action which may have 3 possible values:
>>
>>We don't need a new option, we can add a new value to the
>>completion-auto-help.
>>
>>But yes, I think this behavior you propose _must_ be optional, most
>>probably opt-in for starters. Not everyone will want it.
>>
>>See also completion-cycle-threshold: this new behavior should not
>>tramp that option.
>
>I tend to agree Eli, but actually I started a thread because the default
>behavior is indeed inconsistent with completion-auto-help as the same
>Stefan mentioned.
>
>The current behavior mixes the completion-auto-help==t with
>completion-auto-help=='lazy when there is some completion and the
>completions are already visible (hiding them).
>
>If we do:
>
>compi<tab> it should be completed, but if the completions list is
>somehow visible, then after the tab it is not correct, so we currently
>hide it, when we must just update it right?
>
>The fix in any case is extremely simple and I think that with a new vale
>for completion-auto-help to 'always it will work, but may be even
>complicated to explain in the documentation...
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: completion_custom.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2238 bytes --]
diff --git a/lisp/minibuffer.el b/lisp/minibuffer.el
index 36b8d80841..c6a803cbc4 100644
--- a/lisp/minibuffer.el
+++ b/lisp/minibuffer.el
@@ -898,7 +898,11 @@ completion-auto-help
is requested but cannot be done.
If the value is `lazy', the *Completions* buffer is only displayed after
the second failed attempt to complete."
- :type '(choice (const nil) (const t) (const lazy)))
+ :type '(choice (const :tag "Disabled" nil)
+ (const :tag "Enabled legacy" t)
+ (const :tag "After a second attempt" lazy)
+ (const :tag "Visible update" visible)
+ (const :tag "Always update" always)))
(defvar completion-styles-alist
'((emacs21
@@ -1343,16 +1347,19 @@ completion--do-completion
(completion--cache-all-sorted-completions beg end comps)
(minibuffer-force-complete beg end))
(completed
- ;; We could also decide to refresh the completions,
- ;; if they're displayed (and assuming there are
- ;; completions left).
- (minibuffer-hide-completions)
- (if exact
- ;; If completion did not put point at end of field,
- ;; it's a sign that completion is not finished.
- (completion--done completion
- (if (< comp-pos (length completion))
- 'exact 'unknown))))
+ (cond
+ (exact
+ ;; If completion did not put point at end of field,
+ ;; it's a sign that completion is not finished.
+ (minibuffer-hide-completions)
+ (completion--done completion
+ (if (< comp-pos (length completion))
+ 'exact 'unknown)))
+ ((pcase completion-auto-help
+ ('visible (get-buffer-window "*Completions*" 0))
+ ('always t))
+ (minibuffer-completion-help beg end))
+ (t (minibuffer-hide-completions))))
;; Show the completion table, if requested.
((not exact)
(if (pcase completion-auto-help
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220309001013.gxyh2uasbuxiz6ww.ref@Ergus>
2022-03-09 0:10 ` Question about completion behavior Ergus
2022-03-09 0:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 1:46 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 3:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 10:11 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 11:46 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 13:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 13:46 ` Po Lu
2022-03-09 17:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-03-09 17:41 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 0:42 ` Po Lu
2022-03-10 10:21 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 11:15 ` Po Lu
2022-03-10 14:03 ` Ergus
2022-03-10 18:50 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-10 22:35 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 18:31 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 14:58 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 0:17 ` Ergus
2022-03-12 18:34 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 11:21 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 17:44 ` Juri Linkov
2022-03-13 18:50 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-13 19:49 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 20:48 ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2022-03-13 21:15 ` Ergus
2022-03-13 23:14 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-13 23:38 ` Ergus
2022-03-14 2:23 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-12 20:25 ` Drew Adams
2022-03-09 14:30 ` Ergus
2022-03-09 16:14 ` Ergus [this message]
2022-03-09 16:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 13:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-03-09 14:22 ` Ergus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220309161453.g3ta6sd2xqzvwcgr@Ergus \
--to=spacibba@aol.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).