Re: [PATCH] completions-max-height

[Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:47:13AM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> writes:
>
>> I understand your intention, but in practice making this more complex
>> is useless. The mini buffer is always down and making the completions
>> to move somewhere else is uncomfortable and may require more
>> lisp/emacs knowledge to change the default behavior from the
>> user. Which is completely the opposite to my intention. Actually this
>> same result may be reached with an advise as I discussed on yesterday
>> on emacs help. But a simple custom is better.
>>
>> I am totally fine if you propose something else more general if that don't forces the user to write a function to change a simple height.
>
>What I proposed would just require something like
>
>    (setq completion-display-buffer-option '(display-buffer-at-bottom (window-height . 10)))
>

This just works:

(setq display-buffer-alist '(("^\\*Completions\\*$" .
			      (display-buffer-at-bottom
			       (window-height . 10)))))

For the simplest case this works... But there is not a way to handle the
conditionals without affecting some users. For example when using inline
completion or the ones using resize-temp-buffer-window

We can use a function instead, but in that case the user customization
may need a more complex approach instead of just a setq.

Maybe a better lisper could propose something better that allows to set
this without a defun, an advise or defining a tricky alist that may
conflict with something else?