From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles
 nearly every Chinese =?utf-8?B?ZW1hY3Nlcu+8nw==?=
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 09:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <20211114.100727.985553285850636249.wl@gnu.org>
References: <87ee7jwpgk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83y25rur06.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y25r6uq8.fsf@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="16479"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, tumashu@163.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: luangruo@yahoo.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 10:08:36 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mmBV6-000440-E1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:08:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mmBV4-0007gW-N3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:08:34 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35540)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <werner.lemberg@posteo.de>)
 id 1mmBUE-0006Pp-T0
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:07:44 -0500
Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:36793)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <werner.lemberg@posteo.de>)
 id 1mmBUD-0007rt-GS
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:07:42 -0500
Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55AD2240027
 for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:07:38 +0100 (CET)
Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HsRKz39Cfz6tmr;
 Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:07:35 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <87y25r6uq8.fsf@yahoo.com>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65;
 envelope-from=werner.lemberg@posteo.de; helo=mout01.posteo.de
X-Spam_score_int: -39
X-Spam_score: -4.0
X-Spam_bar: ----
X-Spam_report: (-4.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279404
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/279404>


> [...] Noto CJK fonts tend to have glyphs for Chinese characters that
> are badly designed and in many cases, plain out incorrect.

Interesting.  AFAIK, the CJKV glyphs are based on the 'Adobe Source'
family.  Could you point out some of the problems?  Or maybe do you
have links to bug reports?  Normally, both the Adobe and Google font
folks are quite willing to fix such issues.


    Werner