From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles nearly every Chinese =?utf-8?B?ZW1hY3Nlcu+8nw==?= Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 09:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <20211114.100727.985553285850636249.wl@gnu.org> References: <87ee7jwpgk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83y25rur06.fsf@gnu.org> <87y25r6uq8.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16479"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, tumashu@163.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: luangruo@yahoo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 10:08:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mmBV6-000440-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:08:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmBV4-0007gW-N3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmBUE-0006Pp-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:07:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:36793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmBUD-0007rt-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 04:07:42 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55AD2240027 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:07:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HsRKz39Cfz6tmr; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:07:35 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87y25r6uq8.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=werner.lemberg@posteo.de; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -39 X-Spam_score: -4.0 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279404 Archived-At: > [...] Noto CJK fonts tend to have glyphs for Chinese characters that > are badly designed and in many cases, plain out incorrect. Interesting. AFAIK, the CJKV glyphs are based on the 'Adobe Source' family. Could you point out some of the problems? Or maybe do you have links to bug reports? Normally, both the Adobe and Google font folks are quite willing to fix such issues. Werner