From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp LSP Server Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:08:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20211012130849.GE32113@tuxteam.de> References: <87fstf3god.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ily2947q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wnmiilve.fsf@posteo.net> <20211012121416.GD32113@tuxteam.de> <87fst6iey2.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FN+gV9K+162wdwwF" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7404"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 15:11:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maHZ9-0001kv-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:11:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maHZ5-00046F-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maHWa-0001JG-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:08:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:41274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maHWW-0002bw-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:08:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=NeSk77PB5dhqTNKVv2hukAMRP/Ubx2biAfJlc3BxOjY=; b=dxE6Hb4QoH41im81kwZmb5Oguguo6mbm4u3yW8aW6Nc3p0J160srNYRYWuFnqDUE4nZ3J9bH6q2lOpFwU9Y+3hYJW/8tSzihby+tSO3Lv9YuR78FU+qWXgRGaQ6u1nN51mb/bvKtDeu0xKyS+r3z2E6YFqmVFwyWq7PYi7PpLJJ7cGlqDkffK7byDm94CMsq/0RqnLnqRuiExuMyVjYPHWQ+Hu4oAJazaA1IAg/OnHZ7E3cW3hCVGGGdMqdeZIKG0E8Q1KLKAW2Ge0Tw/f2PRUIM1e7SunbPfE/zENBUNOL1aDgVJvP26ocaGfCY9aobUft1Plw1n3f08OaulzZDUg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1maHWT-00029b-Pr; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:08:49 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fst6iey2.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276795 Archived-At: --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:51:33PM +0000, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > writes: [...] > > FWIW there are LSP bindings for vim [...] > >From my understanding of vim, this seems more practical, since Vimscript > isn't evaluated at runtime (like in a *scratch* buffer or M-:), or am I > mistaken? I'm not that much into vim. Happy user, yes, but when it comes to hacking at it (even config), my brain is already full with Emacs :) > P.S. could you Cc all the participants in the thread. I wouldn't have > noticed your repose if I hadn't checked the gmane. Hm. I thought I do "global reply" on this list already, since it seems to be local custom. Probably some "list reply" slipped, sorry. Cheers - t --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmFliOEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbBIQCfZynMYnT9XusxHsioHjLy3l5g ZkoAn1li961x6QwRHNq+1rPKGnHT6Xgb =g6su -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF--