From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Make peg.el a built-in library? Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:45:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20210928104542.GH14380@tuxteam.de> References: <875yvtbbn3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bl5k87hq.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87fsuvpod4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ka7wqko.fsf@gmail.com> <87sfxp4ard.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20210928080902.GC14380@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40853"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 28 12:47:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mVAeD-000APv-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVAeC-0002OL-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVAcP-0000yL-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:56142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVAcK-0005hy-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:45:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=GmAf2lDP08QswQOHVHwEZg5s61a4hMAaKs2BJd+jEQg=; b=Md8DjHH0ynnzbmvcHNOqguEnJBqYcftL5pBWFbwyj/aC6XhNcExunO01G1ycWmeWIeYD0ardfVfxmSBnnIfwFT/KhsI9E9SdB/ZT1Xhnn5Qg20+TNPuZXVzxtGsDCWDy6UAs3Ct2nJo171T5cUtLuBRPN3vwSMAePwSZQhKj+5qPGyAwaBptmX4pSPIdA2dXbSavSArGCRO4I6SjPnSJqXHS6GmKtKArly8GqNCSGGm6XXCft/ZMak3QL8+H8AV7IctAJupLFMdA7A/8zq5jCmMsVHtDstFNfTn9c/oJ+tn3YP4O8XYd2H8R6KbJHvmzc6f2dvB9HkV7jfJCo7hqdw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1mVAcI-0006Wc-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:45:42 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275678 Archived-At: --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:32:58AM +0200, Helmut Eller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28 2021, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >=20 > > I don't know at the moment whether there is a (non-constructive) > > proof that CFGs be strictly more expressive than PEGs? >=20 > You could ask this question on the PEG mailing list [1]. Uh, thanks for the links. They'll possibly fill most long evenings this winter ;-) Cheers - t --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAmFS8lYACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaJawCYt5tEWmOk6SPwzpGBRIxrtPBA /QCfXPQIX6DQW6p6vryAgfEQrJ5qXRk= =OLdT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj--