From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20210828075734.GC29375@tuxteam.de> References: <83pmu0rvp8.fsf@gnu.org> <32274c2c-1137-1a18-264e-ca294dfda42a@yandex.ru> <878s0ma4ek.fsf@ypei.me> <20210828.065708.1996755748955057415.wl@gnu.org> <83tujanhd0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8485"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 09:58:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtET-0001w4-M2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:58:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtER-000534-Tu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtDd-0003wn-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:49044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtDc-0000FC-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:57:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=0Lc+3PE9+7fWurOjghn9FE7mM9R7U0kgm/CFv5C6jJU=; b=ns6nyWiZ1hLQvX+GCaFQOK4djP/gnz72fwmpwM0Ctafq4LJxs6E/Cn+akzaJFvepDIlsGkWe6tusEKZBdb2oBAWmtdBslLgew/IRvELHI9RjeK67WEv+Hsi7aZ+f6oDPKJ0JMhKxZS1D7vx0JlfLWU8RXWtJ7QZukAvwUz5h5UZVTbTx43BBvt/TJF0s2riRcV0Is2JTTcgz0N+/mRzW5WVFYVRxX53nbW3hq+n7aIgSQxcaYm0MKW5HSI88D8lYVhlI/iJf4FHESbLOVdMspbDqjBweSg2LQmtYHuSJBVa89MbidequsWgOTNpb/iq9bRuy7cOPYqXXjG0LDVfEpA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtDa-0008VM-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:57:34 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83tujanhd0.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273245 Archived-At: --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:44:27AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:57:08 +0000 (UTC) > > From: Werner LEMBERG [...] > > Just curious: What about using a gitlab instance (which uses the > > GPL-compatible Expat License) on either gnu.org or an existing one > > like gitlab.freedesktop.org? Has this already been considered? I > > couldn't find this in the emacs-devel list archive. >=20 > You mean, forking it and developing our own version free of those > problems? That depends on the resources GNU could use for that: if > there's a need for significant changes, we'd need to maintain that > fork forever. In that case, it seems advisable to understand first why this strategy didn't work out with debbugs ("our" version seems to languish in a state that even merging back Debian's improvements over years has become a difficult task). Cheers - t --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmEp7G4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYOeACeP56HPd74miYpWJw+ylu4cjBS D9QAn3T4Xug8WVbrTYXF9+TbkRLQIVkW =dwRB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hOcCNbCCxyk/YU74--