From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git master head build failure? Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20210401091759.GD16534@tuxteam.de> References: <875z16en2o.fsf@gmail.com> <8735waelo4.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfa2h327.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/unnNtmY43mpUSKx" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 11:18:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRtTc-0006JV-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:18:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60876 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRtTb-0004Ge-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRtSm-0003K8-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:34012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRtSk-0003xk-FY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:18:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=nth9z4QGW5xS3kULnEBk5pzlj0XUnXH2SLqxzJi9VEQ=; b=AQk4MUt6UXJnYe552HEja9ZaFYHnzj62W/Pdynz3NcHHceMRCTiOt+rG6iwBrpTlBw+t4mkF3OBsPrXUR+/yi7RJXiDPT2d+eNoptD2S+HbNM+vx9p2MPmPhSTy0WXbGtINS8WHMYcc8gYWQYDhc7X0jfgHIEJ42VasPKYwPDLHaRvvNDuNcAw0krPFf9R/zR9RD6Lee3HpjSjGReYTLopx+m5GQNMYNjBbgDnaePuP1GsqCsdpmNFxQqBh0BhHl3S090WpWVeAtDaXCFjQmk/mBj591urVuixOXx7M51Y5G5/NabngMYtZaSai263zoLGJmfjJUtlzOAlA/Ko5A+Q==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lRtSh-0006CU-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:17:59 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267245 Archived-At: --/unnNtmY43mpUSKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:57:58PM +1100, Tim Cross wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 18:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > > From: Tim Cross > > > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:10:50 +1100 > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > > > I wonder if it would be possible for make maintainer-clean to somehow > > > look at what is in .gitignore and ensure anything in there is also > > > removed? Would be good if at least that target returned the repo to an > > > exact replica of what you would get if you did a fresh clone. If you want /that/, then don't ask make -- ask git :-) Look into `git clean'. Lots of options for cases where you want it actually to remove files (-f) or just to tell you (-n), whether to remove only ignor= ed files (-X) or everything not known by the repo (-x) and so on. Decisions, decisions :-) I usually go with -fx. Teaches me hard lessons whenever my living room is untidy :-D I think one should strive to keep repo and build system as orthogonal as possible (although they both fight hard against that ;-) Cheers - t --/unnNtmY43mpUSKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmBlj8cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ5zgCfa/OlWigZTKD1lfd3spK00Opo /SYAn2Zq/v0et3DDJYxD7TpbWncfzJ5r =yPm+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/unnNtmY43mpUSKx--