From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:06:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20210312130643.GF18812@tuxteam.de> References: <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21347"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 14:07:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhW2-0005Si-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:07:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhW1-000514-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhVH-0004Xo-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:06:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:59971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhVF-0000pa-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:06:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=ZlCAoo6siAUX3unfGxyW+4uIP1VlzMMKcNUqko5eQHc=; b=halu35GF7AvdvpxyNwCYIS7Cl4NXFFbNRPtcSmfUCH2n09M1/ZaiYjyYtf4y6/YWA8+0t8+p2gD9ayO1xpc5kRVmn4jYdXXVgSy6ouLRDaVU2ffjIGVQVfSKXaYwPLuBgCpSV3ql4lTs/TWN+bcyKfIyqoDaPasUAyDHmGAmVJknjSXGA8oHVQEepE4VvF6cf4mnBBH41WdHLN1GNyeAWp2m/HzlBuZ9KtUfAB1kWavuCkFp5SrD1acVHLyacL+bJzYTsib1oD02r+fXjpjOdcVasXzH+aJ9h/CR77oqsleBpqTAk6NndScBXTWtUPHgS6J8Dr7o1lnwKdz1JOTt8A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhV5-0006Rt-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:06:43 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266393 Archived-At: --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:43:34PM +0000, Gregory Heytings wrote: [...] > I understand that you find the "C-x x f" not as convenient as "M-o > M-o", although it seems to me that for a not-often-used command, > that binding could be okay, but that's just me. What do you think > of the "C-M-|" binding I proposed? DISCLAIMER: I'm not touched by this, since I don't use this command often. For me, it's clearly in the "M-x" category. But when doing such keybindings, please think of us poor sods with a non-US keyboard. For many, "C-M-|" degenerates to a "C-M-AltGr-|", which is... acrobatic :-) (not saying you shouldn't do it, just raising awareness) Cheers - t --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmBLZ2MACgkQBcgs9XrR2kadxQCeLKAkzlhqiYTOj3Ngl6BjweQK dnwAn0ujhrSwi1mDhcRHKPCx/gxzlInQ =dsht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK--