On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:43:13PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> The recent discussion around loops motivated me to look a bit further
> into named-let.  It's actually easy to define:

:-)

I'm always impressed by the tricks the Lisps can do, at
the hands of experts.

And thanks, Stefan, for explaining things in a way I
can (think I) understand them :-)

(Back on topic: I grew some affection for the named let
from the Scheme/Guile side, so thanks for that, too)

Cheers
 - t